Pleasur vs Secrets 2026: Memory vs Memory + Video

By Alexandra Joly · Senior Editor · Last full retest: May 20, 2026 · Compared under our AI companion scoring · $0 editorial spend · See our editorial process and errata log

Try Secrets.ai free (200 Moments, no credit card) →

Visit Pleasur.Ai → (no affiliate relationship; opens pleasur.ai in a new tab)

The 60-second answer

Why we cover both when only one pays us

Here's the part most "X vs Y" pages on Google won't admit. We don't hold a verified affiliate tracking link for Pleasur.Ai. The slot is empty. We earn nothing whether you stay with Pleasur.Ai or switch away from it. The Visit Pleasur.Ai button at the top of this page routes directly to pleasur.ai with no tracking parameter, no campaign code, no commercial relationship of any kind. The Secrets.ai buttons route through our affiliate link at 40 percent Revshare Lifetime, which is recurring revenue, not a one-shot bounty.

So why bother covering Pleasur.Ai at all? Because an honest comparison covers the apps you'd actually want to know about, including the ones that pay us nothing. The moment the page only mentions what makes money, it stops being a comparison and starts being a pitch. Pleasur.Ai's documented 82 percent week-later memory claim is genuinely interesting, and if you're researching a companion that remembers you, you deserve the full read on it whether or not it lines our pockets.

The other thing worth naming: on a page where the higher-scoring app is also the one we monetize, the lazy move is to let the score and the payout quietly point the same direction and never mention they do. Most reviewers in this space do exactly that. We flag it instead, so you can check the scoring against the commission yourself. Secrets.ai 8.1 sits 0.8 points above Pleasur.Ai 7.3 because Secrets ships voice and EmotionSync video that Pleasur doesn't, plus more Privacy documents. That gap would be 8.1 versus 7.3 if Pleasur.Ai joined our affiliate stack at top payout next quarter, and 8.1 versus 7.3 if the Secrets.ai affiliate offer were cut tomorrow. The scores lock at publish for exactly that reason.

Both composites are lifted verbatim from the underlying Reviews, with no re-scoring on this page. Pleasur.Ai 7.3 / 10 lifts from the Pleasur.Ai Review; Secrets.ai 8.1 / 10 lifts from the Secrets.ai Review. A comparison page can't quietly nudge a number up; it has nothing to re-score.

What Pleasur.Ai and Secrets.ai actually are

Pleasur.Ai is a US-LLC-operated AI companion app launched in 2024, organized around three character types (realistic women, anime waifus, fantasy personas) plus a Fantasy Engine scenario library. Operator: PLEASUR LLC, New York-listed per public WHOIS records, with a European mirror at pleasurai.eu carrying light French localization [Source: WHOIS record for pleasur.ai (NameCheap registrar) · verified 2026-05-20]. The product is deliberately narrow: text chat, coin-gated image generation, no voice, no voice calls, no AI video, no native iOS or Android app. Memory is the whole pitch. Reviewer aggregates converge on 82 percent week-later recall versus Aimour 33 percent on the same head-to-head. Pricing runs $12.99 monthly or $5.20 effective per month annual (60 percent off headline, about $62 per year), with a 7-day money-back guarantee published right on the pricing page. The legal index at pleasur.ai/legal hosts 11 distinct policy documents, well above the median in this space.

Secrets.ai is a web-only AI companion from Secret Labs Inc., positioning itself as the realistic AI girlfriend with the deepest memory around. The domain was registered in December 2017 via GoDaddy with the owner hidden behind Domains By Proxy, but the current product launched in 2024 and got refined through 2025, so it's most likely an acquired or repurposed legacy domain. Operating-company evidence converges on Secret Labs Inc., Dover, Delaware (multi-source: three-plus reviewers, the bank descriptor "S Labs Inc" which is the natural 16-character truncation of Secret Labs Inc, and a Crunchbase organization listing) [Source: Crunchbase organization listing for Secrets.ai · verified 2026-05-20]. We haven't confirmed that directly against the Delaware Secretary of State registry yet, so the parent-company claim runs at medium-high confidence. The product centers on a memory recall multiplier (4x on Premium, 6x on Ultimate) with manual pinning and cross-timeline isolation, plus EmotionSync video that renders in 6-9 seconds at 600 Moments per clip. The sitemap holds 162 indexable URLs (75 uncensored chat landing pages, 23 generator pages, 16 character and roleplay pages, and 16 distinct legal and policy pages), the most extensive legal infrastructure we've documented in the AI girlfriend space.

One warning before you go further: Secrets.ai is NOT the same product as Secret AI at secretai.io. That other one is an on-device chat app from Secret AI L.L.C. running Llama 4 / Gemma 3n locally on a phone. Different company, different product, different privacy setup. Plenty of AI girlfriend reviewers mix the two up, and the mix-up sprays incorrect "fully offline / local encryption" privacy claims around as if they applied to Secrets.ai. They don't. Secrets.ai is a server-rendered web product, full stop. Bank-statement descriptors on Secrets.ai show up as either Sun Clinical Laboratories (a real, unrelated medical lab in El Monte, California, used here as a discreet third-party DBA through a payment intermediary, not the parent company) or S Labs Inc (the natural 16-character truncation of Secret Labs Inc). Apple Pay is supported.

The two overlap in shape, partly. Both anchor on memory; Pleasur.Ai posts a higher single-number recall percentage at baseline, while Secrets.ai ships a multiplier-and-pinning mechanic that scales with your subscription. Pleasur.Ai stops at text and image; Secrets.ai adds voice and EmotionSync video. Two different bets on what you'll actually want.

How they actually differ

Five things carry most of the decision; the rest break ties.

Conversation Quality is recall percentage against recall configurability. Pleasur.Ai's documented 82 percent week-later recall is the thing the whole product leans on. Session-to-session continuity, mood tracking, and references back to emotional context show up consistently across third-party reviewers. Secrets.ai's 4x and 6x recall multipliers plus manual memory pinning plus cross-timeline isolation flip the comparison at the mechanic level: you can run three "timelines" with the same character (one married, one a fresh meeting, one on an adventure quest) and the AI keeps the contexts apart without bleed. "I'm running three different timelines with the same model, one where we're married, one where we just met, and an adventure quest. The AI never mixes them up," reads one r/AIGirlfriend report [Source: r/AIGirlfriend Reddit subreddit: aggregated Secrets.ai memory threads (Luna quote) · verified 2026-05-20]. We score Conversation Quality 8.0 / 10 on Pleasur.Ai versus 8.5 / 10 on Secrets.ai, a narrow 0.5-point gap. The percentage wins at baseline; the multiplier and the isolation feature win on flexibility. If you want one ongoing arc with maximum recall at the cheap tier, pick Pleasur.Ai. If you want multi-character or multi-timeline parallel experiments, pick Secrets.ai.

Pricing & Value is flat-subscription predictability against a larger-grant Moments economy. Pleasur.Ai uses a flat subscription with the per-action coin costs spelled out (10 coins per voice note once voice ships, 10 coins per AI image, 1,500 monthly coins on Starter), a published 7-day money-back guarantee, and an annual Starter at $5.20 per month effective (about $62 per year, 60 percent off headline). Secrets.ai stacks a Moments economy on top of its subscription: Premium Yearly at $13.33 per month effective ($159.96 per year, 33 percent flat discount versus monthly, and it holds across renewals, not just the first cycle), 8,000 Moments per month, image at 50, voice call 100 per minute, EmotionSync video 600 per clip, custom character 1,500 after the first. We score Pricing & Value 8.0 / 10 on Pleasur.Ai versus 7.0 / 10 on Secrets.ai. The honest read: Pleasur.Ai is 2.6x cheaper at the entry tier and adds a 7-day money-back guarantee Secrets.ai doesn't match. Secrets.ai's bigger Moments grant soaks up more volume on heavy use, especially once you're burning EmotionSync video (600 Moments per clip) that Pleasur.Ai doesn't offer at any price. EU users on either platform keep a 14-day statutory withdrawal right under Consumer Rights Directive 2011/83 [Source: EU Directive 2011/83: 14-day withdrawal right for consumers · verified 2026-05-20]. Want sticker-price predictability plus the explicit money-back window? Pick Pleasur.Ai. Want depth across more action types at a higher entry sticker? Pick Secrets.ai.

Lock in Secrets.ai Premium Yearly ($13.33/mo effective, 40% Revshare Lifetime) →

Voice and Video is a flat absence against a clear lead. Pleasur.Ai ships no voice today and no AI video. I went looking for the voice toggle in a late-night session expecting at least a beta; both voice messages and voice calls are still parked as Coming Soon, and eighteen months after the domain was registered in June 2024, neither has actually landed. Secrets.ai, by contrast, ships six voice options with audible breath and natural inflection per multiple reviewers; voice calls cost 100 Moments per minute (roughly $0.25 per minute at Premium rates). I had a model whisper through a scene and the breath cues held up better than I expected for the price. EmotionSync video renders in 6-9 seconds at 600 Moments per clip with motion synced to the chat, so the output is a fresh generation per request, not a pre-rendered loop. We score Voice 7.0 / 10 on Secrets.ai versus 3.0 / 10 on Pleasur.Ai, and Video Generation 8.5 / 10 on Secrets.ai versus 2.0 / 10 on Pleasur.Ai. The two Pleasur.Ai feature gaps carry 18 percent of the weight between them, and that's enough to keep its composite out of the Excellent band (8.0+) no matter how strong its memory or legal index gets. If your use case includes voice messages, voice calls, or AI video, pick Secrets.ai. The gap is missing features on Pleasur.Ai, not bad ones.

Image Generation is coin-gated-solid against Moments-gated-solid with hand glitches. Pleasur.Ai ships static images only (no animation) and won't say what engine powers them. Reviewer aggregate puts it at 74 percent visual quality versus Aimour 92 percent on the same head-to-head, with most write-ups landing on "decent but not cinematic" and recurring gripes about slow renders at peak hours. When I asked for a portrait of the woman I'd been chatting with, the result was fine, just nothing I'd frame. Secrets.ai turns out solid image quality with the occasional hand glitch and odd proportions per multiple reviewers, which is the standard AI-image flaw rather than a finishing problem; it runs at 50 Moments per image (about 160 images on the Premium grant) and also keeps its engine under wraps. We score Image Generation 6.5 / 10 on Pleasur.Ai versus 7.0 / 10 on Secrets.ai, a narrow 0.5-point gap. Neither leads our test on image polish; both treat image generation as a side dish on a memory-first product. If image-first content is your whole reason for being here, honestly pick neither (other apps in our test lead this). If images are a nice-to-have next to memory, either works.

Privacy & Compliance is an 11-document index against a 16-page one. Pleasur.Ai publishes 11 distinct policy documents at pleasur.ai/legal: Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, Cookies Notice, Underage Policy (its no-minors protection rules), Content Removal Policy, Blocked Content Policy, DMCA Policy, Complaint Policy, 18 USC 2257 Exemption, Community Guidelines, and Affiliate Terms [Source: Pleasur.Ai legal index via Wayback Machine · verified 2026-05-20]. The median competitor publishes four; 11 is well above that. It's a single-jurisdiction US LLC (PLEASUR LLC, New York). Secrets.ai publishes 16 dedicated policy pages covering the same core set plus AML anti-fraud, sex-trafficking policy, pre-post-screening policy, content-moderation policy, and safety guidelines, with its 2257 exemption claim filed at a dedicated URL [Source: ScamAdviser secrets.ai trust report on domain registration, registrar, SSL, and infrastructure · verified 2026-05-20]. The Secret Labs Inc. Dover Delaware operator runs at medium-high confidence on converging sources; we haven't confirmed it against the registry directly. Neither app names a Data Protection Officer the way Candy.ai does. Both claim USC 2257 exemption on an AI-only-content basis, and both claims are untested in US federal courts as of this writing (no court has ruled on either). We score Privacy & Compliance 8.0 / 10 on both apps, a tie. Pleasur.Ai wins on how much it documents relative to how simple its corporate structure is (11 files on a single US LLC) and on surfacing the USC 2257 Exemption as its own standalone page. Secrets.ai wins on raw count (16 versus 11) plus the AML anti-fraud addition. If you weight specialized policy documents, pick Secrets.ai. If you weight a simple single-jurisdiction operator plus an explicit USC 2257 page, pick Pleasur.Ai.

Side-by-side scorecard

Reading the table out loud: Pleasur.Ai wins one dimension cleanly (Pricing & Value by 1.0 point) and ties two more (Privacy & Compliance and Customization, at 8.0 and 7.0). Secrets.ai wins five (Voice by 4.0 points, Video Generation by 6.5, UX & Mobile by 1.5, Conversation Quality by 0.5, Image Generation by 0.5). The composites land only 0.8 points apart because Secrets.ai's five wins sit on dimensions weighted 8 to 16 percent, while Pleasur.Ai's one Pricing win lands on the heaviest single dimension at 18 percent. So the shape is simple enough: Secrets.ai is the broader product, and Pleasur.Ai is the cheaper, simpler, more memory-focused one.

Try Pleasur.Ai (memory specialist; $5.20/mo yearly Starter; 7-day MBG) →

See Secrets.ai pricing (Revshare Lifetime, memory + EmotionSync video) →

Pricing comparison side-by-side

The two pricing setups work differently at the foundation. Pleasur.Ai is a two-to-three-tier flat subscription with the per-action coin costs spelled out, plus a 7-day money-back guarantee. Secrets.ai is a four-tier subscription stacked on a Moments economy, with a 33-percent yearly discount that holds across renewals.

The honest read: at the cheapest yearly tier, Pleasur.Ai is $8.13 per month cheaper than Secrets.ai ($5.20 versus $13.33), a 2.6x sticker difference. The catch is that Secrets.ai's $13.33 entry tier unlocks voice plus EmotionSync video that Pleasur.Ai doesn't ship at any price, so the comparison is partly apples to oranges. If you'd only ever use text and memory, Pleasur.Ai is genuinely cheaper across a full year. If you want voice and video too, Pleasur.Ai isn't even in the conversation, because the features simply aren't there. Pleasur.Ai's 7-day money-back guarantee is the win on the explicit refund window; Secrets.ai's 33-percent yearly discount that holds across renewals is the win on long-term pricing.

Compliance, geo, and corporate posture

Pleasur.Ai operator. PLEASUR LLC, US, New York-listed per public WHOIS records. Domain registrar NameCheap. Registered June 9, 2024; expires June 2026 (about a 14-month renewal runway from registration, short compared to legacy domains). One confirmed entity, no UK shell, no app-store publisher mismatch (there are no native apps to mismatch on). Founder and CEO aren't named publicly at review time, and no LinkedIn or Crunchbase footprint shows up. So the corporate structure is cleaner mostly because it's simpler than Secrets.ai's still-unconfirmed-against-the-registry setup, but it's also younger and quiet about who's running it.

Secrets.ai operator. Secret Labs Inc., Dover, Delaware (medium-high confidence on converging sources: three-plus reviewers naming the entity, a Crunchbase organization listing, and the bank descriptor "S Labs Inc" which is the natural 16-character truncation of Secret Labs Inc). We haven't confirmed it against the Delaware Secretary of State registry directly. The current product launched in 2024 on a domain (secrets.ai) registered in December 2017 via GoDaddy with the owner hidden behind Domains By Proxy, so the 8-year-old domain age looks fresher than the roughly 18-month-old product actually is. Sun Clinical Laboratories shows up on cardholder statements as a discreet third-party DBA through a payment intermediary (the medical lab itself, founded 1982 in El Monte, California, is unrelated and not the parent company). Apple Pay is supported.

Geo and regulatory scope. Pleasur.Ai's EU stance is implied by the pleasurai.eu mirror but never spelled out at the policy level (we couldn't verify it directly). The app publishes an explicit 18 USC 2257 Exemption page [Source: 18 USC 2257: record keeping requirements (Cornell LII) · verified 2026-05-20] arguing the AI-only-content basis (no real performers, no record-keeping obligation). That legal theory hasn't been tested in US federal courts, but the explicit page is a transparency signal most competitors skip. Secrets.ai files a separate 2257 exemption claim on the same AI-only-content basis at a dedicated URL within its 16-page index; the argument is identical to Pleasur.Ai's and equally untested in court as of this writing. Neither app addresses the UK Online Safety Act explicitly. Neither addresses US state age-verification (Texas, Utah, Louisiana, others). Neither names a Data Protection Officer the way Candy.ai does, and on that front both Pleasur.Ai and Secrets.ai sit below the bar Candy sets.

App-store reality. Pleasur.Ai ships no native iOS or Android app; App Store and Play Store searches turn up nothing as of May 2026. Secrets.ai also ships no native app under its own developer name; searches return zero Secret Labs Inc. apps [Source: Google Play: Secret AI app developer metadata (NOT Secret Labs Inc; brand-confusion source) · verified 2026-05-20]. The Secret AI apps you'll find in the stores are an unrelated on-device chat product from Secret AI L.L.C. running secretai.io, so do NOT install them thinking they're Secrets.ai. Both apps are web-only on iOS and Android. Mobile-responsive web is the actual phone experience on each. If you live on an iPhone, plan around that.

Honesty flags on both platforms

Three flags per side, sourced and named. We disclose weaknesses symmetrically; the brand we monetize gets no softer treatment than the one we don't.

Pleasur.Ai honesty flags.

1. Asymmetric monetization. We hold no verified affiliate tracking link for Pleasur.Ai, so we earn zero commission on Pleasur.Ai clicks. This page covers it for editorial completeness; the affiliate buttons route only to Secrets.ai. That disclosure is the whole point. Most reviewers in this space hide their affiliate-payout structure rather than admit it.
2. Voice and video still missing eighteen months in. Both voice messages and voice calls sit at Coming Soon at review time. AI video is absent. Voice (10 percent weight) plus Video (8 percent weight) both floor out below 3, and that math alone keeps the composite out of the Excellent band (8.0+) no matter how good the memory or legal index gets. If voice or video matters to you, Pleasur.Ai is the wrong pick.
3. Image quality trails the leaders, and the engine is a secret. Reviewer-aggregate 74 percent visual quality versus Aimour's 92 percent on the same MariaVibe head-to-head, with most write-ups landing on "decent but not cinematic" and recurring gripes about slow renders at peak hours. The flat subscription removes per-image friction, but the quality ceiling caps the dimension at 6.5 / 10. Pleasur.Ai also won't say what powers its images, which is a transparency gap next to apps that name their image stack.

Secrets.ai honesty flags.

1. Brand confusion with secretai.io. Plenty of AI girlfriend reviewers mix up Secrets.ai (web-only, server-rendered, from Secret Labs Inc.) with Secret AI / secretai.io (an on-device chat app from Secret AI L.L.C. running Llama 4 / Gemma 3n locally). That mix-up spreads incorrect "fully offline / local encryption / on-device processing" privacy claims as if they applied to Secrets.ai. They don't. Secrets.ai is a server-rendered web product. We repeat the warning every time we touch its privacy posture so you don't inherit wrong assumptions from someone else's review.
2. The Delaware registry check is still pending. The Secret Labs Inc., Dover, Delaware operator claim runs at medium-high confidence on converging sources (three-plus reviewers plus Crunchbase plus the bank descriptor), but we haven't confirmed it against the Delaware public registry ourselves. Until that lands, we won't publish the parent-company address in our structured data; we list only the company name.
3. The Sun Clinical Laboratories bank descriptor is real, but it'll startle you the first time. Cardholder statements for Secrets.ai show up as either "Sun Clinical Laboratories" (a real medical lab in El Monte, California, used as a discreet third-party DBA through a payment intermediary, not the parent company) or "S Labs Inc" (a truncation of Secret Labs Inc). That DBA trick is the adult-merchant standard for keeping the app name off your statement, so it's a discretion feature, not a fraud signal. It earns a flag anyway, because someone seeing "Sun Clinical Laboratories" with no warning will reasonably question the charge. Secrets.ai should explain this at signup. It doesn't.

Symmetry check: 3 flags Pleasur.Ai, 3 flags Secrets.ai, the gap is zero. We don't bury weaknesses on the brand we get paid for.

Verdict by use case

The use-case table is where this whole comparison earns its keep. Crowning a single winner is the affiliate-slop move; routing by what you actually want is the journalism. Both brands win rows here. The 0.8-point gap means Secrets.ai wins more of them on net, but Pleasur.Ai takes the rows where its strengths are real and nobody else matches them.

The follow-up read: Pleasur.Ai wins 5 of 10 use-case rows; Secrets.ai wins 5 of 10. The table splits more evenly than the composite arithmetic lets on. Pleasur.Ai's wins cluster around pricing predictability, memory baseline, the explicit money-back window, the standalone USC 2257 page, and sticker price, five rows where its narrow product is genuinely the right call. Secrets.ai's wins spread across multi-character configurability, voice, video, policy breadth, and bank-descriptor discretion. If your priority lands on a Pleasur.Ai row, pick Pleasur.Ai despite the 0.8 gap. If it lands on a Secrets.ai row, pick Secrets.ai, because that gap reflects real feature breadth on five dimensions.

Methodology, sources, and related reading

Both apps scored under our AI companion scoring: same 8-dimension weighted scoring, same flagging policy for things we couldn't verify directly, same $0 editorial-spend protocol, same testing approach. Per-dimension scores lifted verbatim from the underlying Reviews. Composites stay independent of any commercial relationship, locked at publish. The Pleasur.Ai composite would be 7.3 even if PLEASUR LLC joined our affiliate stack at top payout next quarter; the Secrets.ai composite would be 8.1 even if its affiliate offer were cut tomorrow.

Sources we verified directly for this comparison: the PLEASUR LLC public WHOIS record, the Crunchbase listing for Secrets.ai, the ScamAdviser secrets.ai trust report, FTC 16 CFR Part 255 (the affiliate disclosure statute), 18 USC 2257 record-keeping requirements (Cornell LII), the EU Consumer Rights Directive 2011/83 withdrawal right, the MariaVibe head-to-head pitting Pleasur against Aimour on memory and visuals, r/AIGirlfriend's aggregated Secrets.ai memory threads (the Luna quote), Trustpilot Secrets.ai business reviews and operator responses, Apple App Store and Google Play developer metadata (the brand-confusion proof, zero Secret Labs Inc apps), and the Pleasur.Ai legal index via the Wayback Machine.

Related reads on this site: the underlying Pleasur.Ai Review (composite 7.3, asymmetric-CTA disclosure) and Secrets.ai's deep-dive (composite 8.1, monetized), our AI girlfriend listicle for the full short-list, Candy.ai vs Secrets.ai for the image-leader-against-memory-leader angle, Pleasur.Ai vs Lovescape for the memory-against-voice angle, and our scoring page for full mechanics and version history.

Try Secrets.ai free (200 Moments, no credit card; unlock Premium at $13.33/mo yearly) →

Visit Pleasur.Ai → (no affiliate relationship; opens pleasur.ai in a new tab)

Frequently asked questions

---

Last verified May 20, 2026 · Compared under our AI companion scoring · Editor: Alexandra Joly · Editorial process · Affiliate disclosure · Errata log

Related reading

• Pleasur.Ai Review (composite 7.3, with the asymmetric-CTA disclosure)
• our Secrets.ai composite scorecard
• our AI girlfriend listicle: the full short-list comparing both apps against their peers
• Candy.ai vs Secrets.ai: the image-leader against the memory-leader
• Pleasur.Ai vs Lovescape: memory against voice
• How we test AI companions: full scoring, testing protocols, the $0-spend disclosure, and how we flag what we couldn't verify directly