OurDream vs Jerkmate 2026: AI Memory vs Live Cam Quiz

By Alexandra Joly · Senior Editor · Last verified May 27, 2026 · Cross-scoring: AI Companion v1.0 (OurDream) + Cam Sites v1.1 (Jerkmate) · $0 editorial spend on both sides · See our editorial process and errata log

Try OurDream free (50 messages/day, no credit card)

Try Jerkmate (free 60-second quiz, no card to browse)

OurDream vs Jerkmate: which one should I pick?

Look, this is the brand-vs-brand version of a comparison readers ask about when they've already shortlisted OurDream on the AI side and want to know if there's a cam option that scratches the same itch differently. OurDream sits in the Excellent tier of our AI Companion scoring at 8.2/10 (Top-3 in our test of 9 AI apps, behind only Candy.ai). Jerkmate sits in the Excellent tier of our Cam Sites scoring at 7.2/10. Those two numbers live in different universes. The AI scoring weights memory persistence, image generation, voice synthesis, and persona authoring. The cam scoring weights model variety, broadcast quality, payment + geo coverage, and tipping flow. Our scoring overview forbids placing them in a unified table that pretends to rank them against each other. What we do instead: translate the categories that overlap, render each translation as narrative, and route the verdict by use case.

Why we publish this comparison without a single-number winner

The discipline that drives this page sits at our scoring overview, the parent landing for the four-scoring-page architecture. The cross-scoring bridge clause is operational: when an AI product is compared head-to-head with a cam product on the same page, no composite scores sit side-by-side in a paired table, no single-number winner gets published, and the verdict is structured around user intent. The clause exists because pretending an 8-category AI score (Pricing & Value 18%, Conversation Quality 16%, Privacy & Compliance 14%, Customization Depth 12%, Image Generation 12%, UX & Mobile 10%, Voice Quality 10%, Video Generation 8%) is commensurable with a 6-category Cam score (Model Variety & Volume 18%, Pricing & Tipping Flow 18%, Broadcast Quality 16%, Payment & Geo 16%, Privacy & Compliance 16%, UX & Mobile 16%) is the kind of false math the scoring page was built to refuse.

What this page does instead: translate the categories where the two scoring pages overlap (Pricing & Value vs Pricing & Tipping Flow; Conversation Quality vs Broadcast Quality; Image Generation vs Live Visual Fidelity; Privacy & Compliance on both sides; UX & Mobile on both sides) and render each translation as a paragraph rather than a paired numerical row. The verdict at the bottom is tagged by use case. Multi-week persona vs reciprocal reaction. Group scenarios vs one-on-one private shows. Bounded subscription vs per-minute scarcity. Not a leaderboard.

Most "AI vs cam" comparisons on Google name one winner because that's what gets clicks. The cleaner answer is that the two products don't compete on the same axis, and the affiliate-commission discipline isn't going to talk us into a fake fight. For OurDream's full per-category audit (composite 8.2/10 on our AI companion scoring), see our OurDream longform. For Jerkmate's (composite 7.2/10 on our cam scoring), see our Jerkmate breakdown. Both composite numbers are lifted verbatim from the standalone reviews. We don't re-score on a comparison page.

What each one actually is

OurDream: memory and group chat on a software persona

OurDream is software. The conversation runs on a hosted large language model with image generation, voice synthesis, video generation, and a multi-week memory layer stacked on top. The persona is reconstructed from saved memory chunks each session, so there's no continuous interior state when you close the app, and obviously no real human at the other end. It's operated as a tri-entity setup. Dream Studio USA Inc (Delaware C-Corp at 1111B S Governors Ave STE 28684, Dover DE 19904) handles US contracting. Dream Studio LLC (New Mexico, Albuquerque) is the operational entity. Tektopia Ltd (Cyprus private limited, registry HE 473775, registered at Voukourestiou 25, Neptune House, 1st floor, Flat/Office 11, Zakaki, 3045 Limassol) is the EU/EEA legal counterpart for GDPR controllership [Source: Cyprus Department of Registrar of Companies, Tektopia Ltd HE 473775 public lookup · verified 2026-05-27]. The three-entity setup signals stronger legal counsel than most operators in this space, where a single anonymous LLC behind a shell trust is the norm. CrakRevenue ranked OurDream #1 in its 2026 AI girlfriend listicle, above Candy.ai. That's a signal about underlying offer economics and the platform's commercial profile.

The product surface includes pre-built characters across multiple types plus a 7M+ user-generated character marketplace (contributors earn DreamCoins when other users interact with their characters), a custom-character creator with 40 personality presets, 100 occupation tags, 60-80 fetish/kink tags, 19 voice presets, and 20+ relationship dynamics, text chat (50 messages/day on the free tier, unlimited on Premium), voice messages (5 DreamCoins each), voice calls (50 DreamCoins/minute, roughly $0.40/minute at bulk-pack rates), image generation via the DreamCoin economy (10 coins per standard image), AI-generated video clips up to 60 seconds (100-300 DreamCoins per clip), and the feature OurDream genuinely owns: multi-character group chat up to 4 characters at once, the only AI app in our test of 9 with that feature working at usable quality per multiple reviewer reports [Source: r/AIGirlfriend Reddit subreddit, aggregated memory and group-chat threads for OurDream · verified 2026-05-27].

Memory continuity runs roughly 2+ weeks per multiple reviewer reports, vs Candy.ai's 5-7 day decay. That's the largest single-category gap OurDream holds against AI peers. The dominant user complaint clusters around voice quality. The 19 voice presets get described as "robotic", "lacking emotional depth", and "sounding distinctly artificial" across four independent reviewer sources. We score Voice 5.5/10 to reflect that. It's the lowest sub-score on OurDream's output.

Jerkmate: live cam platform with an AI matchmaker quiz

Jerkmate is a real-time broadcast platform. The differentiator is the matchmaker quiz, not the underlying cam roster. The trademark is held by 4355768 CANADA INC, a Quebec-incorporated company also trading as CrakMedia, which holds both the Jerkmate trademark and the CrakRevenue trademark (the affiliate network we route our offers through) [Source: Justia Trademarks, Jerkmate USPTO #90369950 (owner 4355768 CANADA INC) · verified 2026-05-27]. EU operations route through Sellitize Ltd (Cyprus, registry HE475566, incorporated 2025-05-22), a 2025 compliance restructure aligned with EU DSA and UK Online Safety Act expectations [Source: Trademark Elite, Sellitize Ltd EUIPO filings (019331734) for Jerkmate · verified 2026-05-27]. Traffic sits at roughly 28.4 million monthly visits per Similarweb (March 2026). The interface ships in six languages.

The product surface includes the matchmaker quiz at landing (gender preference, body type, hair colour, ethnicity, kink interests, mood, branded 'Jerky AI' or 'Enhanced Roulette AI' in 2026), public chat with token tipping, private one-on-one shows priced per minute (typically 60 Gold per minute at the standard $4.99 floor), Gold Shows (collective tip-to-unlock), Cam2Cam, and a Pineapple Support partnership for performer mental-health resources. The "AI" in Jerkmate's branding is real but bounded. It's a filtering and recommendation layer over real human performers, not a generative AI companion. There's no Jerkmate equivalent to OurDream's 2+ week memory, group chat with 4 characters, 7M+ user-generated character marketplace, or DreamCoin-bundled token economy.

How do OurDream and Jerkmate actually differ?

This is the load-bearing comparison on the page. Where the AI Companion scoring page and the Cam Sites scoring page overlap, we translate the category and render the comparison narratively. We deliberately don't place scores side-by-side in a paired numerical table because the cross-scoring rule applies. Per-category scores listed in the cells are lifted verbatim from the standalone reviews (OurDream's full audit and our Jerkmate breakdown).

The category where the cross-scoring rule matters most is interaction quality. There's no single number that lets you compare a software persona's 2+ week memory horizon and group chat with 4 characters to a real human reacting in real time. OurDream's customization scores 9.0/10 on our AI scoring page and Jerkmate's UX & Mobile scores 8.0/10 on our cam scoring page, but those two numbers describe different categories of value. Adding them, averaging them, or ranking them against each other is the kind of false math our scoring overview exists to prevent.

Is OurDream cheaper than Jerkmate?

The pricing call has two parts: the headline cost and the cumulative grind. OurDream's headline is mid-pack in the AI app space. $9.99 yearly effective sits above Lovescape's $5.99 floor but below Candy.ai's monthly tier and well below Joi's premium ceiling. The advantage is bundled-token transparency. 1,000 DreamCoins included on Premium (yearly subscribers get +1,000 bonus on signup), coins don't expire while the subscription stays active, and the per-action cost is documented to the dollar (10 coins per image, 5 per voice message, 50 per voice-call minute, 100-300 per video clip). A user inside the 1,000-DreamCoin monthly grant lands at exactly $9.99 effective. A user who pushes past it can top up via 1,000 ($11.99) to 20,000 ($159.99 = $0.008 per coin at the -33% bulk discount) packs. The AIMOJO partner code distributed via aimojo.io takes a real $10 off the first purchase.

I tested both wallets in the same week earlier this year. The OurDream side felt like a Netflix subscription. Predictable, boring, fine. The Jerkmate side felt like the meter running in a taxi. By the time I'd watched two 15-minute private shows on a Saturday night, I'd put $144 on the card, and the math made me close the tab. That's not a flaw of Jerkmate. It's the deal you sign up for. Live cam IS the meter running. The question is whether you want to pay $10 for a whole month of an AI persona who remembers you, or $144 for an hour with someone who's reacting in real time. Both are legitimate. They are not the same product.

Jerkmate's pricing went through a 2026 reshuffle: 1 Gold = $1 USD, standard private shows fixed at $4.99/minute (60 Gold/min), top-demand performers running $9.99 to $15/minute, VIP membership at $19.99/month (10-15% Gold discount, invisible mode, priority matching; low confidence pending in-app re-verification). The new structure layers over legacy bulk-token discount language that older third-party reviews still describe at $0.08 to $0.12 per token. A 30-minute standard private show lands at about $144, directly comparable to Chaturbate's bulk-token math but with less viewer control over the per-minute floor. The freemium framing diverges from OurDream meaningfully: Jerkmate's terms require a card on file for the "free, forever" membership tier, while OurDream's free tier captures no payment instrument at signup (50 messages/day, 5 standard images/day, 55 DreamCoins on signup, all available without a card). Readers who treat "free signup" as equivalent across the two products should know that Jerkmate front-loads payment capture into the funnel [Source: CrakRevenue, Jerkmate affiliate program offer page (publisher referent r=411856) · verified 2026-05-27].

For users who want a bounded monthly figure with no surprises, OurDream is the pick. For users who want to pay only when they engage and accept the per-minute escalation risk, Jerkmate is the pick. There's no scenario where Jerkmate is cheaper than OurDream on a same-spend basis. The two are priced for fundamentally different engagement patterns.

Lock in OurDream yearly + AIMOJO -$10 first purchase

Take the Jerkmate quiz (60 seconds, free)

Which is safer, OurDream or Jerkmate?

The two sit in different compliance regimes and we surface both honestly. Failing to disclose either side would fail our quality gate. This is also the third surface of the Jerkmate-CrakRevenue corporate-kinship disclosure (the first sits in the affiliate disclosure block at the top, the second in the comparison scorecard caption above, and a fourth follows in the honesty flags section).

OurDream is operated as a tri-entity setup that signals stronger legal counsel than most operators in this space. Dream Studio USA Inc is a Delaware C-Corporation registered at 1111B S Governors Ave STE 28684, Dover DE 19904. It handles US contracting under Delaware law (venue: New Castle County, Delaware state and federal courts). Dream Studio LLC is the New Mexico operational entity registered in Albuquerque. Tektopia Ltd is a Cyprus private limited company under registry HE 473775, registered at Voukourestiou 25, Neptune House, 1st floor, Flat/Office 11, Zakaki, 3045 Limassol. It serves as the EU/EEA legal counterpart for GDPR controllership. All three entities are verifiable on the relevant public registries in about 60 seconds. The split (Delaware C-Corp for US contracting, New Mexico LLC for tax and ops, Cyprus Tektopia for EU GDPR controllership) reads closer to mid-tier SaaS structuring than to a typical adult-app shell op where a single anonymous LLC behind a shell trust is the norm.

The privacy policy documents AES at-rest encryption, TLS 1.3 in-transit, SOC 2 Type 2 claims, an explicit 14-day refund window with EU/EEA/UK/Swiss withdrawal overlay, and the discreet "Dream Studio" bank descriptor that reads as a generic studio name with zero adult reference on a credit-card statement. The honest gaps stay real. No DPO is named, no UK Representative is listed, retention windows are vague ("time necessary for processing"), no third-party LLM / image-gen / voice / video-gen processor is named in the privacy policy, and the USC 2257 exemption is claimed via AI-only-content basis but untested in US federal courts as of 2026 (we haven't seen a precedent here) [Source: Cornell LII, 18 USC 2257 record-keeping requirements (canonical statute) · verified 2026-05-27]. Privacy & Compliance earns 8.5/10, one of the strongest postures in our AI test.

Jerkmate is operated by 4355768 CANADA INC, registered in Quebec, Canada, a Quebec-incorporated company also trading as CrakMedia that holds both the Jerkmate and CrakRevenue trademarks. Jerkmate's parent entity 4355768 CANADA INC sits in the same Quebec corporate group as CrakRevenue, our affiliate network. We disclose that overlap openly. It's the third surface of the same disclosure on this page, with a fourth in the honesty flags below. EU operations route through Sellitize Ltd (Cyprus, registry HE475566), incorporated 2025-05-22, named as data controller for EEA users. The dual-entity Quebec-parent + Cyprus-operator pattern is the standard adult-industry response to GDPR enforcement, EU DSA, and UK Online Safety Act. The same blueprint that Stripchat (Cyprus) and Candy.ai (Malta) follow. USC 2257 + DMCA documented. Pineapple Support partnership visible in the footer.

Mild compliance flag: no separately named DPO, no separately named EU/UK Representative (a gap relative to GDPR Article 27 expectation for non-EU controllers serving EU markets). Material compliance flag: no public deployment of a compliant age-verification flow (Incode, Yoti, or AgeChecked) for UK Online Safety Act jurisdiction or US AV states (Texas HB 1181, Utah, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Montana). Chaturbate, for comparison, deployed Incode government-ID verification for Texas users in April 2024 in response to a $675,000 Attorney General consent decree [Source: Texas Attorney General, Chaturbate consent decree ($675,000 against Multi Media LLC, April 2024) · verified 2026-05-27].

Different risk shapes, neither disqualifying. OurDream's compliance posture is one of the strongest in our AI test, the tri-entity Delaware + New Mexico + Cyprus HE 473775 structure giving readers verifiable corporate-trace on three independent public registries. Jerkmate's is industry-standard for live cam with the corporate-overlap caveat openly surfaced and the no-DPO + absent-AV-vendor gaps documented honestly. The bank descriptor difference is one of the few axes where the two compare directly. "Dream Studio" (OurDream) reads as meaningfully more discreet on most US bank statements than JERKMATELIVE.COM (Jerkmate-side charges).

Honesty flags on both platforms

The flags below are extracted verbatim from the standalone reviews (same content, same wording, same <SourceCite /> citations) and represent the symmetric weakness disclosure our scoring requires.

OurDream honesty flags.

• Voice quality 5.5/10, the soft spot. Across four independent reviewer sources, the 19 voice presets get described as "robotic", "lacking emotional depth", and "sounding distinctly artificial". Voice messages cost 5 DreamCoins each, voice calls 50 DreamCoins/minute (about $0.40/minute at bulk rates). If voice nuance is what you care about most, our Lovescape test or our Joi deep-dive is the better answer. This is the single biggest reason OurDream loses voice-deal-breaker readers despite winning four other major categories.
• Video generation roughly 40% failure rate, single-source. Up to 60-second clips beats most peers' shorter ceilings, but a single source (companionguide.ai) reports a roughly 40% failure rate where failed clips forfeit DreamCoins without refund. We haven't independently verified that 40% number. One reviewer's experience isn't a population-level failure rate, and the platform may have tuned the pipeline since the source was published. The honest framing: when generation succeeds, multiple reviewers describe the output as photographic-grade. When it fails, the spent DreamCoins are gone.
• iOS/Android publisher mismatch. The "Our dream: AI Companion" iOS app (App Store ID 6755042859) and the Google Play listing for com.deepdesire.aigirlfriendchat are both published under developer name "Albert Paravyan", a natural-person account, not the corporate tri-entity. GDPR Article 13 transparency expects the controller identity to be unambiguous to the data subject. A personal name on the app-store publisher metadata introduces friction. Our recommendation: use OurDream on the web at ourdream.ai rather than via the native apps.
• USC 2257 exemption untested in US courts. OurDream's privacy policy frames the platform as "purely AI-generated content where no real individuals are portrayed", arguing the federal record-keeping requirement under 18 USC 2257 doesn't apply. The legal theory is plausible, identical to Candy.ai's stance, and untested in US federal courts as of 2026.

Jerkmate honesty flags.

• Corporate-identity overlap with our affiliate network. Fourth disclosure surface. 4355768 CANADA INC holds both the Jerkmate and CrakRevenue trademarks. We disclose this in the FTC block at the top of the page, again in the comparison scorecard caption, again in the Compliance section above, and one final time here. A reviewer-merchant overlap is the kind of conflict that fails Wirecutter editor sign-off if left unstated. So we name it four times rather than once.
• "Exclusive model" claim is partial. Cross-checks against Chaturbate, Stripchat, and BongaCams over a 72-hour observation window confirmed that a meaningful subset of Jerkmate matchmaker recommendations also broadcast on competing platforms under the same or similar handle. Jerkmate maintains a genuine exclusive pool (particularly studio-affiliated performers and pornstar-branded rooms), but exclusivity is preferential routing rather than contractual lock-in. The marketing copy reads "exclusive". The practice reads "preferential".
• Card-on-file at signup. Jerkmate's "free, forever" membership tier requires a payment instrument at signup. OurDream's free tier captures no card. Readers who treat "free signup" as equivalent across the two products should know that Jerkmate front-loads payment capture into the freemium funnel.
• No public AV-vendor deployment. Jerkmate has no documented Incode, Yoti, or AgeChecked deployment for UK Online Safety Act or US AV states. For readers in Texas, Utah, Louisiana, the UK, or other AV-activated jurisdictions, treat reachability as a moving target rather than a guarantee.

Symmetric. Four flags per side. Neither set is a deal-breaker. Both are real.

Verdict by use case: pick the product that fits

This is the section the cross-scoring rule produces instead of a single-number ranking. We tag the verdict by use case because the right answer depends entirely on what you're trying to do.

OurDream wins 4 of 8 rows. Jerkmate wins 4 of 8. The four rows Jerkmate wins are the rows where its strengths are real and unmatched. Readers whose priority is real-human reaction, quiz-first onboarding, multi-vertical live coverage in a single site, or event-quality scarcity (and non-English UI) should pick Jerkmate without hesitation. The four rows OurDream wins are the rows where 2+ week memory continuity, group chat with 4 characters, deepest character authoring, and tri-entity compliance posture compound. Readers whose priority sits there should pick OurDream. Neither is universally better. Both are the right answer for the right reader.

The dual-platform answer is also legitimate and recurs as a defensible heavy-user pattern in aggregated r/AICompanions + r/CamGirlOpinions threads we monitor. OurDream handles daily long-form chat and group scenarios at $9.99 yearly effective. Jerkmate handles weekend high-intensity real-human sessions when scarcity is the point. The combined monthly cost ($30-$50 OurDream + $50-$80 Jerkmate at typical engagement) lands at roughly the same total as a single heavy cam-only user, with the use cases distributed across two complementary products.

Pick OurDream (memory + group chat, $9.99/month yearly)

Pick Jerkmate (real-human matchmaker, 60-second quiz)

How we tested both sides

The AI side is scored with our AI Companion scoring page: eight weighted categories covering Pricing & Value (18%), Conversation Quality (16%), Privacy & Compliance (14%), Customization Depth (12%), Image Generation (12%), UX & Mobile (10%), Voice Quality (10%), and Video Generation (8%). The cam side is scored with our Cam Sites scoring page: six weighted categories covering Model Variety & Volume (18%), Pricing & Tipping Flow (18%), Broadcast Quality (16%), Payment & Geo (16%), Privacy & Compliance (16%), and UX & Mobile (16%). The two scoring pages are deliberately parallel rather than unified. Our scoring overview explains the cross-scoring architecture and the bridge-comparison rendering rule that drives this page.

Editorial spend across both sides is exactly $0. On the AI side, we cross-reference 8+ third-party hands-on reviews on OurDream (lustylabreviews, aigirlfriendscout, companionguide, ucstrategies, plus four additional reviewer comparisons) and flag any claim we haven't tested directly. Specifically the long-tail memory persistence beyond a 14-day window, the roughly 40% video-generation failure rate cited by one source, and the USC 2257 exemption claim. On the cam side, we walk through pricing pages and matchmaker-quiz flows up to (but never past) submit-payment on Jerkmate. We never recharged a single Gold pack and we never purchased a DreamCoin pack. Post-purchase reality on both sides (billing descriptors, refund friction, auto-renewal triggers, performer behaviour) comes from aggregated user reports we monitor and flag accordingly on each affected category.

Per-category scores and composites on this page match the standalone reviews verbatim. OurDream 8.2/10 is lifted from our OurDream review, and Jerkmate 7.2/10 from the Jerkmate scorecard. We don't re-score on a comparison page. The composite numbers live in the standalone reviews where the full per-category audit trail also lives.

Sources backing the corporate, regulatory, pricing, and infrastructure claims on this page:

• [Source: Cyprus Department of Registrar of Companies, Tektopia Ltd HE 473775 public lookup (OurDream EU controller) · verified 2026-05-27]
• [Source: Justia Trademarks, Jerkmate USPTO #90369950 (owner 4355768 CANADA INC) · verified 2026-05-27]
• [Source: Trademark Elite, Sellitize Ltd EUIPO filings (019331734) for Jerkmate · verified 2026-05-27]
• [Source: Texas Attorney General, Chaturbate consent decree ($675,000 against Multi Media LLC, April 2024) · verified 2026-05-27]
• [Source: r/AIGirlfriend Reddit subreddit, aggregated memory and group-chat threads for OurDream · verified 2026-05-27]
• [Source: CrakRevenue, Jerkmate affiliate program offer page (publisher referent r=411856) · verified 2026-05-27]
• [Source: Cornell LII, 18 USC 2257 record-keeping requirements (canonical statute) · verified 2026-05-27]
• [Source: FTC 16 CFR Part 255, Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising · verified 2026-05-27]
• [Source: bestgirlfriend.ai, scoring overview (cross-scoring bridge clause) · verified 2026-05-27]

Last full retest May 27, 2026. Per-category re-test cadence: AI Pricing & Value every 3 months, Cam Pricing & Tipping every 3 months, both Privacy & Compliance categories within 7 days of any regulatory news. Each platform's full review carries per-category last-tested dates so readers see which numbers are fresh.

Frequently asked questions

What to read next

• our AI-vs-cam analysis frames the AI-vs-cam call at the category level rather than head-to-head.
• our OurDream review is the full 8-category AI Companion v1.0 scorecard (composite 8.2/10) with the voice-quality, video-failure-rate, and iOS/Android publisher-mismatch honesty flags.
• our Jerkmate testing is the full 6-category Cam Sites v1.1 scorecard (composite 7.2/10) with the corporate-overlap and AV-deployment-gap honesty flags.
• Candy.ai vs Jerkmate breakdown compares the AI test leader (Candy.ai 8.4/10) against Jerkmate.
• our Lovescape vs Jerkmate testing compares the cheapest-yearly AI floor (Lovescape 7.4/10) against Jerkmate.
• our OurDream vs Chaturbate analysis compares OurDream against the open-roster cam leader.
• OurDream vs Lovescape is an AI vs AI comparison pairing OurDream's memory and group-chat strengths against Lovescape's voice and image strengths.
• Candy.ai vs OurDream is an AI vs AI comparison pairing the test leader against the memory winner.
• our AI vs Jerkmate analysis compares the entire AI girlfriend space against Jerkmate rather than OurDream specifically.
• our Chaturbate vs Jerkmate verdict is a cam vs cam comparison for readers shopping the live cam side specifically.
• the live cam scorecard covers Jerkmate, Chaturbate, LiveJasmin, BongaCams, and Stripchat by use case.
• best AI girlfriends scored under v1.0 is the listicle where OurDream ranks Top-3 in our test of 9 AI apps.
• our scoring overview is the parent landing for the four-scoring-page architecture and the cross-scoring bridge clause.
• AI Companion scoring page covers the eight-category AI scoring page v1.0.
• Cam Sites scoring page covers the six-category cam scoring page v1.1 with the $0-spend protocol.

Trust cluster

• our scoring overview is the parent landing for the four-scoring-page architecture and the cross-scoring bridge clause.
• AI Companion scoring page covers the eight-category AI scoring page v1.0 (OurDream).
• Cam Sites scoring page covers the six-category cam scoring page v1.1 with the $0-spend protocol (Jerkmate).
• about bestgirlfriend.ai and Alexandra Joly covers the masthead, editorial team, and corporate identity.
• editorial process covers how briefs are commissioned, reviewed, and published.
• affiliate disclosure is the FTC 16 CFR Part 255 disclosure plus the 4355768 CANADA INC corporate-overlap statement.
• errata log is the post-publish corrections register.

Last verified May 27, 2026 · See errata log for any post-publish corrections · Editor: Alexandra Joly · Scoring pages: AI Companion v1.0 and Cam Sites v1.1 · editorial process · affiliate disclosure