Harem Villa vs Candy.ai: Dating Sim vs AI Persona

By Alexandra Joly, Senior Editor • LinkedIn • Last full retest: 2026-05-20 • Bridge comparison under our AI companion scoring (Candy.ai) and our adult-game scoring (Harem Villa) • $0 editorial spend on both sides

Try Candy.ai (free signup, 5-message lifetime cap on free) →

Try Harem Villa (free signup, no card captured) →

Are Harem Villa and Candy.ai actually comparable?

Harem Villa vs Candy.ai sits inside our broader porn games vs AI girlfriend category breakdown. Most of our head-to-head pages put two products of the same type next to each other (Chaturbate vs Jerkmate, Candy.ai vs Joi, Harem Villa vs Comix Harem). A page like this one, an AI persona against an adult game, exists because people actually type that pairing into Google. The searches blur both ways: someone hunting "candy ai vs" stumbles onto adult-game names, someone on "harem villa vs" stumbles onto AI-companion names. So it needs its own comparison rule, which I'll lay out before we dig in. A sister page covers the Kinkoid equivalent at Hentai Heroes vs Candy.ai; this one zeroes in on the IT Delaza operator quirk that makes Harem Villa genuinely different from the rest of the adult games we score.

Why does this comparison skip a single-number winner?

Here's the rule, and it's worth a second to explain because it's the whole reason you can trust this page. When we put an AI product head-to-head with an adult game, we don't drop two totals side by side and let one "win." Our scoring overview spells it out. No combined number, no leaderboard, just a verdict pointed at what you're actually trying to do.

Why bother? Because pretending an AI score (Pricing & Value 18%, Conversation Quality 16%, Privacy 14%, Image Generation 12%, Customization 12%, UX 10%, Voice 10%, Video 8%) is the same currency as an adult-game score (Pricing & Value 20%, Content & Cadence 18%, Game Mechanics 16%, Privacy 14%, Art Direction 12%, Billing Transparency 10%, UX 10%) is fake precision. The Billing Transparency check is the giveaway. No competitor we read grades billing transparency at all, no AI-companion scoring we compared ourselves against includes it, and bolting it onto Candy.ai would punish it for a category that doesn't exist in its world.

So here's what we do instead. Where the two scoring systems genuinely overlap (Pricing & Value on both sides, Privacy & Compliance on both sides, and a loose mapping of Image Generation to Art Direction and Customization to Content & Cadence), we compare them in a paragraph, not a paired number row. The verdict at the bottom is sorted by intent. If you want Candy.ai's full scorecard (composite 8.4 / 10), it's in our Candy.ai full review, where it lands as our top AI girlfriend pick, and in the Candy.ai vs Joi head-to-head. If you want Harem Villa's full positioning (composite 6.8 / 10), see the dedicated Harem Villa IT Delaza review and the same-category Harem Villa vs Comix Harem comparison.

What is each product, exactly?

Candy.ai, the software persona

Candy.ai is an AI companion you chat, look at, and listen to. Conversation runs on a hosted large language model, with image generation, voice synthesis, and a memory layer on top. The persona gets rebuilt from saved memory chunks every session, so there's no continuous inner life once you close the app, and obviously no real person on the other end. It's run by EverAI Limited, a Malta company (registry C107181) [Source: Malta Business Registry: entity search portal (EverAI Limited C107181) · verified 2026-05-20], which has publicly claimed 25 million dollars in annual recurring revenue through end-of-2024 (their own number, no audited accounts published) and roughly 23.49 million monthly visits in February 2026 per Similarweb (an estimate, the usual 20-to-30-percent margin applies). The AI girlfriend and anime characters are the headline product, with the whole persona library living on one account.

You get pre-built characters (100-plus per style), full custom-character creation with 20-plus attributes (ethnicity, age range, body type, voice, kinks, personality presets), text chat (5-message lifetime cap on free, unlimited on paid), voice messages and voice calls, image generation through a token economy (2 to 4 tokens per image), AI-generated video replies (12 tokens), and freeform roleplay. The image generation is the strongest I've seen in the AI companion space, whether I'm asking for a girl or a guy (Reddit consensus across several threads backs this up, no formal benchmark exists) [Source: r/AICompanions thread: Candy memory and image-gen consensus · verified 2026-05-20]. Memory is the big complaint, and I've felt it: reports cluster around a 5-to-7-day window before the persona starts forgetting you (Reddit-aggregated, we haven't run a controlled benchmark on it ourselves).

Harem Villa, the choice-based dating sim with Credits and parallel-relationship arcs

Harem Villa is a browser-based adult dating sim that launched in 2024. The loop is choice-based dialogue and parallel-relationship storytelling: your decisions shift the emotional and romantic bonds with several female characters across branching arcs. It plays more like a visual novel than a gacha-collection or battle game. It's run by IT Delaza EOOD, a Bulgarian limited company in Kyustendil, per the footer disclosure on haremvilla.com [Source: haremvilla.com on-page operator footer (IT Delaza EOOD, Bulgaria, Kyustendil) · verified 2026-05-20].

Now the corporate detail, because this is the thing that sets Harem Villa apart from every other adult game we cover. Five of the other six brands we score are run by Gamadu LTD (Cyprus, registry HE 419214), trading publicly under the Kinkoid name, with development in Sofia, Bulgaria (around 120 staff per the company's own Steam Dev page). Harem Villa is run by IT Delaza EOOD instead, a Bulgarian limited company in Kyustendil. And here's the odd part: IT Delaza's own corporate site lists four mainstream mobile games (Mother Life & Baby Simulator, Jungle Island, Valley Merge, and an unnamed fourth project), but Harem Villa is nowhere on it [Source: IT Delaza EOOD corporate site: public portfolio (4 named projects, Harem Villa absent) · verified 2026-05-20]. That fits a white-label or contract setup, or a deliberate choice to keep adult content off the corporate window. We report the gap straight and don't guess past what the footer actually says. What matters to you: your billing relationship is with IT Delaza EOOD, the contract venue is Bulgaria, and your GDPR data requests run through Bulgaria, not Cyprus or France.

On the product itself: you get free signup with no card captured, a story onboarding arc, choice-based dialogue trees with parallel-relationship branches, and a Credits economy (also called Gold or Bucks in the Terms) for scene unlocks and premium characters, bought through the in-game Bank page via Segpay. The artwork is a 2024-vintage curated style, sharper than the Kinkoid 2014-era assets. The marketing surface claims 2 to 4 live events per week including holidays, which we haven't tracked across a full month yet. You play in a web browser (desktop and mobile-responsive). There's no native iOS app (App Store bans adult content), no Android Nutaku APK route at our research time (odd, since the rest of the Kinkoid catalog ships through Nutaku sideload), and no Steam version.

Where do the AI and adult-game scores overlap?

This is the heart of the comparison. Where the AI companion scoring and the adult-game scoring genuinely line up, we translate the axis and compare in plain words. What we won't do is stack the two scores in a single number row, for the reasons above.

Three of the things we check have no match on the other side, and rather than invent one, we just say so. Candy.ai's Conversation Quality check (16% of the AI score) has no Harem Villa equivalent, because Harem Villa runs scripted dialogue trees inside choice-based arcs. No language model writes the lines, nothing carries across sessions, and there's no roleplay depth past what the branching script already wrote. Going the other way, Harem Villa's Game Mechanics & Balance check (16% of the adult-game score) and its Billing Transparency check (10%, only adult games get this one) have no Candy.ai equivalent, because Candy has no progression layer beyond its session-to-session memory, and the AI scoring has no billing-transparency category by design. Adding a 9.0 from the conversation side to a 9.0 from the game-mechanics side is exactly the fake precision we built the bridge rule to avoid. Our scoring overview lays out the full rule.

How much does each one actually cost?

Pricing has two parts: the headline number and the grind that builds up after. Candy.ai's headline is the cheapest in the AI companion space. The 3.99-dollar effective yearly rate is widely quoted, and the discount holds for the whole subscription instead of dying after the first cycle (the promo can change, terms aren't forever). The grind on Candy.ai is image generation and voice calls: the token economy quietly turns paid subscribers into recurring micro-spenders at 2 to 4 tokens per image, 12 per video, 3 per minute of voice call. A heavy image user is buying the 1,150-token pack at roughly 99.99 dollars every two months on top of the subscription.

Harem Villa's headline is "free to play," and the free tier is actually playable. Signup unlocks the story onboarding, the early-game arc, the choice-based dialogue, and Credit-gated scenes you grind toward over time. A 30-day free run is realistic. Reaching late-game content and the full cast without paying is not. The concrete USD Credit-pack prices sit behind sign-up and we haven't paid to verify them, so they're unconfirmed until we walk the full checkout. Payment methods shown on the operator surface include Visa, Mastercard, Discover, JCB, SEPA, Maestro, PayPal, and Bitcoin.

The catch on Harem Villa is the refund stance, quoted straight from the Terms: "haremvilla.com does not provide cash refunds. In some cases we can provide credits (virtual currency) to resolve customer service issues." [Source: haremvilla.com Terms & Conditions: refund policy verbatim · verified 2026-05-20] So it's hard credit-only. Softer than the aggressive billing-trap language you see elsewhere, but firmer than best practice. Buy a Credit pack, decide three days later it's not for you, and you don't get money back; the operator may hand you replacement Credits if it feels like it. The Limitation of Action clause gives you one year to file a dispute in writing, and the account-suspension language lets the operator cut off your Credits without notice. The Centrobill processor in the CrakRevenue popup doesn't show up on the operator's own surface, which could be stale offer copy or geo-routed processors; we'll confirm it on a checkout walk.

The catch on Candy.ai is that 5-to-7-day memory ceiling, and you feel it stack across a week as the persona forgets what you told it on day one. EU users get a 14-day statutory withdrawal right under consumer law that applies to the Malta operator [Source: EU Directive 2011/83: 14-day withdrawal right for consumers · verified 2026-05-20], and cancellation is one click from the dashboard.

If you want a fixed monthly figure with no surprises, I'd pick Candy.ai. If you want a 0-dollar floor with optional microtransactions and you're fine with the credit-only refund going in, I'd pick Harem Villa.

Subscribe to Candy.ai yearly (3.99 dollars per month effective) →

Play Harem Villa for free (Credit packs optional) →

Which is more compliant right now?

The two products sit in different compliance worlds, and we lay out both sides honestly because hiding either one would be the exact thing this site exists to call out.

Candy.ai is run by EverAI Limited, registered in Malta under registry C107181, with offices at 56 Central Business Centre, Triq Is-Soll, Santa Venera SVR 1833. Maltese law and Maltese courts settle disputes per the Terms. The platform publishes 12 dedicated policy URLs, including a USC 2257 exemption page (it argues AI-generated content sits outside 2257, an argument no US court has tested yet), an age-gate exclusion policy, a content-removal policy, and a blocked-content policy. A named Data Protection Officer shows up on the privacy surface, and a UK Representative is named for Online Safety Act handling. The bank-statement descriptor is the discreet "Everai," the kind of low-key line that experienced users actively look for. Cancel is one click from the dashboard. First operating year around 2023.

Now the catch on Candy.ai. It stores every message you send and every image you generate. The privacy policy doesn't promise a hard retention ceiling beyond the disclosed 30-day log window, so long-tail retention is at the platform's discretion (based on the policy as it read this spring, and it can change). The "official Candy.ai" iOS and Android apps list publishers other than EverAI Limited, so I'd treat those as third-party builds and stick to candy.ai web access. That's a real weakness, not a marketing asterisk. The January 2025 Bellingcat investigation, which documented Candy.ai being promoted on MrDeepFakes through third-party affiliate placements (EverAI cut ties once called out), is a second fact we put on the table without dressing it up [Source: Bellingcat: January 2025 MrDeepFakes investigation reference · verified 2026-05-20].

Harem Villa is run by IT Delaza EOOD, a Bulgarian limited company in Kyustendil per the footer disclosure. WHOIS uses Domains By Proxy (privacy redaction), so the operator name comes only from that footer, not from an independent check of the Bulgarian Trade Register at the time we wrote this (that register check is on our list and wasn't done this pass). Bulgarian law settles disputes per the Terms. The named payment processor is Segpay; the CrakRevenue popup also mentions Centrobill, which we couldn't confirm on the operator's own surface. Payment methods shown include Visa, Mastercard, Discover, JCB, SEPA, Maestro, PayPal, and Bitcoin. PayPal genuinely works here, which is rare among the games we cover where PayPal is usually missing.

Now the catch on Harem Villa, and the missing-from-its-own-site thing is the biggest one. IT Delaza's corporate site describes itself as 5 years in business with 20-plus team members, 2 offices, and 4 projects, and the four named projects are all mainstream mobile games. Harem Villa isn't among them. I won't pretend to know whether this is white-label or contract work for an undisclosed content owner, or a deliberate choice to keep adult content off the corporate window. Both fit the surface evidence and neither is confirmed. The HTTP 500 errors on sitemap.xml and the privacy policy at our research time also limit what we can confirm about data retention and processors. The 2024 launch means the track record (April 2024 onward) is around two years at our research time, against the 7-plus years on Kinkoid brands. That's a real risk, hard to put a number on but worth saying out loud. The hard credit-only refund is normal adult-game friction rather than scam-grade billing-trap, but it's firmer than best practice and matters if you're cautious with your money. Third-party reviews keep mislabeling the operator as "Kinkoid" or a "French studio"; the LGBTQ+ specialist countryqueer.com calls Kinkoid a "French studio" in its summary, and that error spreads through reviews that copy the framing without checking. We have the operator right: IT Delaza EOOD in Bulgaria, separate from Gamadu LTD in Cyprus.

State-level age verification. Texas (HB 1181), Utah, and Louisiana enforce age-verification laws on adult-content platforms; Texas's enforcement is what pushed Pornhub to block the state in 2024. Both Candy.ai and Harem Villa handle those states through third-party verification or geo-block depending on the platform. A Yoti integration shows up in Harem Villa's outbound-traffic signals (Semrush data) but isn't spelled out in the Terms extract we captured.

The fourth place the two pictures genuinely diverge is Billing Transparency, a check only our adult-game scoring has, worth 10% of the adult-game total. The AI scoring has nothing like it, and no competing review system in the space grades it either. It covers auto-renewal clarity, how many payment processors are involved, billing descriptor consistency, the refund window, and clicks-to-cancel, five sub-checks at 10% combined. Candy.ai would score well on those same five (single processor, discreet descriptor, one-click cancel, the 14-day EU withdrawal right). Harem Villa scores 5.0 / 10, the lowest Billing Transparency score in our whole adult-game test. The hard credit-only refund is the single biggest drag; the auto-renewal clarity, the descriptor consistency, and the clicks-to-cancel we haven't verified directly pending a checkout walk and in-game shop access; the second processor (Centrobill) doesn't show on the operator surface. And here's the part most reviewers would quietly skip: Harem Villa pays us far more per signup than Candy.ai. Saying its billing score is the worst in the test, out loud, against that payout, is the whole point of locking scores before commission enters the room.

Honesty flags on both platforms

Every head-to-head on this site names real weaknesses on both sides, matched within one flag, named, and sourced. These come straight from each product's own weaknesses list.

Candy.ai honesty flags.

• Memory ceiling 5 to 7 days. Reports cluster around a 5-to-7-day window before the persona starts forgetting you. One user pattern from r/HeavenGF (July 2025, 35 upvotes, 12 agreeing comments) put it plainly: "after like 5 days she forgot everything" [Source: r/HeavenGF Reddit thread: Candy memory drift verbatim user pattern · verified 2026-05-20]. Reddit-aggregated, we haven't run a controlled benchmark on it ourselves.
• App-store publisher mismatch. The "official Candy.ai" iOS app lists publisher "INTELLIGENT CREATION TECH LIMITED" and the Android app lists "Candy Studio Apps." Neither matches EverAI Limited (Malta C107181). We'd stick to candy.ai web access until that chain is cleared up.
• Bellingcat January 2025 MrDeepFakes investigation. Candy.ai was promoted on MrDeepFakes through third-party affiliate placements; EverAI cut ties once called out. We put it on the table as a fact and don't blow it up.

Harem Villa honesty flags.

• Missing from its own corporate site. Harem Villa is nowhere on IT Delaza EOOD's public corporate site, which lists four mainstream mobile games (Mother Life & Baby Simulator, Jungle Island, Valley Merge, and an unnamed fourth project). That fits a white-label or contract setup, or a deliberate split to keep adult content off the corporate window, and neither is confirmed. The independent Bulgarian Trade Register check isn't done yet.
• Hard credit-only refund, quoted from the Terms. Straight from the source: "haremvilla.com does not provide cash refunds. In some cases we can provide credits (virtual currency) to resolve customer service issues." Firmer than best practice, softer than a billing-trap. The 1-year Limitation of Action clause caps your dispute window.
• Billing Transparency 5.0 / 10, the lowest in our adult-game test. Auto-renewal clarity, descriptor consistency, and clicks-to-cancel are unverified pending a checkout walk and in-game shop access; the second processor (Centrobill) doesn't show on the operator surface. The fat payout on this one (one of the highest on our whole list) makes this score awkward to publish, which is exactly why we publish it. We grade by our test, not by what pays.

That's 3 flags each. Even, no weakness hidden on either side.

Verdict by use case: pick the product that fits

This is what the bridge rule gives you instead of a single number. We sort the verdict by what you want, because the right answer changes completely depending on that.

If you want a persistent AI companion (daily texting, a persona that remembers your preferences across weeks, full customization, image generation on demand, a fixed monthly cost), I'd pick Candy.ai. It leads the AI girlfriend pack on our 8-point scoring, locked in our Candy.ai tested scorecard and the Candy.ai vs Joi head-to-head. The memory limits are real, though: if week-to-week recall matters more to you than image polish, OurDream and GirlfriendGPT score higher on the memory side specifically.

If you want choice-based dialogue and branching story arcs (parallel-relationship storytelling, decisions that genuinely move emotional bonds across several characters, arcs you can replay), I'd pick Harem Villa. The choice mechanic is the real thing that sets it apart from both open AI conversation and collect-the-girls harem games. The 2024-vintage artwork is sharper than the 10-year-old engine assets that anchor Hentai Heroes. The trade-off is the 2-year track record against Kinkoid's 7-plus years.

If you want $0 monthly spend forever, pick Harem Villa. The free tier is genuinely playable; you can grind weeks of choice-based arcs without spending a cent. Progress slows past the early game, Credit-gated scenes pace the late game, but the floor really is 0 dollars. Candy.ai's free tier is capped at 5 lifetime messages, which is a taster, not a usable free tier.

If you want a fixed monthly cost with predictable billing, pick Candy.ai. The 3.99-to-12.99-dollar monthly plan is bounded; the token economy on top is opt-in per action. Single-processor billing, a discreet "Everai" descriptor, one-click cancel from the dashboard. Harem Villa's no-subscription framing looks cheaper at signup, but the credit-only refund and email-only cancellation raise the friction after you've paid.

If you want fresh, uniquely-generated images on demand, pick Candy.ai. Each image is made for your prompt, so no two come out identical. Harem Villa gives you a finite, curated set: consistent because it's curated, but capped at whatever the studio has drawn.

If you want curated artwork on a current art standard, pick Harem Villa. The 2024-vintage illustration is sharper than the 2014-era Kinkoid visuals and reads as one illustrator team, not a patchwork. The trade-off is no native iOS app and no Android Nutaku APK route at our research time, so outside desktop you're on mobile-web only.

If you want a stronger compliance picture and named jurisdiction anchors, pick Candy.ai. EverAI Limited (Malta C107181), a named Data Protection Officer, GDPR / CCPA / Swiss FADP, 12 dedicated policy URLs, a UK Representative for the Online Safety Act, the EU 14-day statutory withdrawal right. Harem Villa carries the missing-from-its-own-site question, the HTTP 500 errors on sitemap.xml and the privacy policy at our research time, and the Bulgarian Trade Register check still pending. That's real weight on the compliance side.

If you want both (daily AI conversation plus choice-based arcs on the side), run both. They don't fight for the same attention window. Combined monthly cost usually lands 15 to 30 dollars above a single subscription. The pattern is common in the adult-gaming and AI-companion communities we read, though we've run no formal survey on it.

The tally lands at Candy.ai 4 use cases / Harem Villa 3 / both 1. Harem Villa wins where the 0-dollar floor, the branching story, and the current-standard curated artwork are what you're after, and if one of those is your priority, pick it without second-guessing. Candy.ai wins where a persistent persona, predictable billing, on-demand image generation, and the stronger compliance picture matter most.

Pick Candy.ai (AI companionship, 3.99 dollars per month yearly) →

Pick Harem Villa (free to play, choice-based dating sim) →

How we tested both sides

The AI side runs through our AI companion scoring: eight weighted checks covering Pricing & Value (18%), Conversation Quality (16%), Privacy & Compliance (14%), Customization Depth (12%), Image Generation (12%), UX & Mobile (10%), Voice Quality (10%), and Video Generation (8%). The adult-game side runs through our adult-game scoring: seven weighted checks covering Pricing & Value (20%), Content & Cadence (18%), Game Mechanics & Balance (16%), Privacy & Compliance (14%), Art Direction (12%), Billing Transparency (10%, unique to this one), and UX & Mobile (10%). The two systems run in parallel on purpose rather than merged; our scoring overview explains why they stay separate.

We spent exactly 0 dollars on editorial testing across both. On the AI side, we tested Candy.ai's free tier and flagged anything we couldn't reach behind a paid sign-up. On the adult-game side, we walked through the haremvilla.com age-gate by hand, read the legal pages, and tried to reach the in-game Bank page inside the free post-signup environment. The sitemap.xml and privacy-policy pages wouldn't load (server errors) at our research time, and we flag those gaps on the score cells rather than fill them with guesses. The full walk to checkout (to confirm auto-renewal language, the billing descriptor, the clicks-to-cancel, and the Centrobill processor) is still to come; until then, the in-game pricing on Harem Villa stays unverified.

What happens after you pay on both sides (billing descriptors, refund friction, auto-renewal triggers, in-game cancellation) comes from aggregated user reports, marked as not-directly-tested on the checks they touch. Trustpilot, Reddit (r/AICompanions, r/AIGirlfriend, adult-game subreddits), and platform forums get weighted by how recent and how numerous they are. The Reddit trail for Harem Villa specifically is thin at our research time (no dedicated subreddit, only scattered threads in nearby adult-game subs), and we say so rather than pad it with speculation.

The bridge rule isn't us being tidy. It's the thing that stops fake precision. A single score across two different systems would reward each product for stuff its users don't care about and blur the signal exactly where it matters. Four parallel scoring systems, each as rigorous as the next, each tuned to what that category's users actually weigh.

Eight public sources backstop the regulatory and corporate claims here (see the citation anchors above): the Malta Business Registry for EverAI Limited C107181; the haremvilla.com operator footer for IT Delaza EOOD; the haremvilla.com Terms for the refund policy quote; itdelaza.com for the IT Delaza portfolio (four named projects, Harem Villa absent); Texas HB 1181 for the age-verification law; EU Directive 2011/83 for the 14-day withdrawal right; r/HeavenGF for the Candy memory-drift consensus; and Bellingcat for the January 2025 MrDeepFakes reference. Each is linked at the point of claim. Last full retest 2026-05-20. Re-test cadence: AI Pricing & Value every 3 months, adult-game Pricing & Value every 3 months, both Privacy & Compliance checks within 7 days of any regulatory news, and the adult-game Billing Transparency check every 6 months or on any payment-processor change.

Frequently asked questions

What to read next

• Porn games vs AI girlfriend (category bridge): the category-level comparison this brand-vs-brand page sits underneath, framing the wider AI girlfriend and adult gaming worlds against each other.
• Harem Villa IT Delaza review: the full adult-game scorecard with the Billing Transparency check applied, plus the IT Delaza EOOD Bulgaria operator disclosure.
• our Candy.ai deep-dive: the full AI companion scorecard, EverAI Limited Malta entity disclosure, yearly promo, and the app-store mismatch flag.
• Hentai Heroes vs Candy.ai: the sister bridge comparison covering the Kinkoid equivalent.
• the Harem Villa vs Comix Harem comparison: a same-category adult-game head-to-head with a shared composite score.
• Candy.ai vs Joi: the same-category AI head-to-head where Candy leads on UX, image generation, compliance, and pricing.
• our Candy.ai vs Stripchat comparison: the sister bridge comparison putting AI girlfriend against live cam.
• Methodology landing: the overview of our four scoring systems and the bridge rule that drives this page.
• Adult Gaming methodology: the seven-check adult-game scoring with the Billing Transparency check.
• AI Companion methodology: the eight-check AI companion scoring.

Trust cluster

• Methodology overview: the overview of our four scoring systems
• AI Companion methodology: the eight-check AI companion scoring
• Adult Gaming methodology: the seven-check adult-game scoring with the Billing Transparency check
• About bestgirlfriend.ai and Alexandra Joly: masthead, editorial team, corporate identity
• Editorial process: how articles are commissioned, reviewed, and published
• Correction policy: how we log and publish corrections
• Affiliate disclosure: FTC 16 CFR Part 255 compliant disclosure

Last verified May 20, 2026 · See errata log for any post-publish corrections · Editor: Alexandra Joly · AI Companion methodology · Adult Gaming methodology · Editorial process · Affiliate disclosure