Janitor.AI vs OurDream: Free Browser NSFW vs Top-3 Premium

By Alexandra Joly, Senior Editor • Last full review: 2026-05-20 • OurDream scored under our AI companion scoring; Janitor.AI written up from public sources (no commercial relationship) • $0 editorial spend

Try OurDream free (50 messages/day, no credit card) →

What is the 60-second answer?

People search janitor ai vs ourdream a lot, usually at the moment they're thinking about leaving. They've outgrown Janitor.AI's BYOL-and-character-library setup and want something more polished, with image generation and a real app, and they want an honest answer before they pay anyone. So this page is half and half: OurDream gets full numerical scoring under our AI companion test, and Janitor.AI gets a written-up profile from public sources, because it isn't in our scored set and isn't a CrakRevenue offer.

Why don't we publish a Janitor.AI score?

Three things drive that gap. First, our AI companion scoring runs a fixed test (ten-prompt conversation runs, five-prompt image-generation runs, a voice-phrase check) on one steady configuration we can hold across re-tests. Janitor.AI's BYOL setup swaps the conversation engine every time you pick a different model, so a single number would hide how much it actually swings. Second, our Privacy & Compliance scoring (worth 14%) wants a named operator with a registered corporate identity, a Data Protection Officer, and a documented policy library. Janitor.AI's operator isn't publicly disclosed at that level, which is a fact we surface but can't fairly score. Third, scoring a non-affiliate platform and then routing readers to a paying competitor would be sketchier, not cleaner, than the honest gap we keep here.

So here's what the page does instead. OurDream gets the full number it earns (composite 8.2/10, lifted straight from the OurDream scorecard). Janitor.AI gets a category-by-category profile from public sources, flagged honestly wherever we haven't tested something directly. You see both halves of the trade and you call it.

What each one actually is

OurDream, the polished premium AI girlfriend with image gen, mobile, and group chat

OurDream is a multimodal AI companion sold as one finished premium product. The conversation runs on hosted language models (five selectable chat backends in the chat view) with image generation, voice, video clips up to 60 seconds, and memory layers stacked on top. You never touch models, API keys, or provider rate limits. It's run by a three-company structure: Dream Studio USA, Inc. (Delaware C-Corp at 1111B S Governors Ave STE 28684, Dover, DE 19904), Dream Studio LLC (New Mexico, Albuquerque), and Tektopia Ltd (Cyprus private limited, registry HE 473775 at Voukourestiou 25, Limassol, which you can verify on the public Cyprus registrar in about a minute) [Source: Cyprus Department of Registrar of Companies (public search portal) · verified 2026-05-20] [Source: OurDream Terms of Service (governing law and corporate identity disclosure) · verified 2026-05-20].

The whole offering is the product: text chat with five selectable backends, voice messages and voice calls, native image generation paid in DreamCoin tokens (10 coins per standard image), AI video clips up to 60 seconds (100-300 coins per clip), group chat with up to four personas at once (the highest ceiling across the 9 apps we've scored), and a 7M-character user-built marketplace where contributors earn DreamCoins when people use their personas. CrakRevenue ranked OurDream AI #1 in its 2026 'Top 10 AI Girlfriend' listicle [Source: CrakRevenue 2026 Top 10 AI Girlfriend chat platforms editorial listicle · verified 2026-05-20], above Candy.ai. The price is capped: Free tier $0 (50 messages a day plus 5 images a day, no credit card), Premium Monthly $19.99, Premium Yearly $9.99/month effective ($119.88 billed annually, -50% versus monthly), an AIMOJO partner code knocking $10 off the first purchase, crypto accepted, and a bank descriptor that just reads "Dream Studio". The native iOS app (App Store ID 6755042859) and Android app (com.deepdesire.aigirlfriendchat) landed November 2025, though I'd still steer you to the web version because of the publisher mismatch I flag below.

Janitor.AI, the free-tier BYOL character library

Janitor.AI is a character-library and persona front-end, launched in 2023 to catch the Character.AI crowd that wanted explicit roleplay without the heavy filters [Source: r/JanitorAI subreddit (community FAQ and BYOL setup discussion threads) · verified 2026-05-20]. The platform itself wraps two pathways: a free native model with rate limits (lower quality, no API key needed), and BYOL, where you plug in an API key from OpenRouter (a broad model marketplace), OpenAI (GPT-4-class), Anthropic (Claude), Kobold (community-hosted), or somewhere else, and that provider bills you directly per token you burn through.

The character library is huge and user-uploaded. Community creators contribute personas with backstories, opening prompts, sample greetings, and their own artwork. Explicit roleplay is on by default with an optional filter you can leave off, which is exactly why people fled Character.AI's filter-first setup for it. There's no native image generation, in any configuration. The artwork on a character is whatever the uploader pinned to it. There's no native mobile app either. It's browser-only, and while the web interface is responsive, you lose push notifications, built-in voice, and the App Store presence you'd expect from something you open every day. And there's no real group chat: one user, one character at a time. Creators rig workarounds with clever prompting, but that's not a built-in feature. Voice isn't built in. And persistent memory is capped by whatever context window your connected model has, since there's no Janitor-side memory layer doing the remembering.

The operator isn't publicly disclosed at any level you could verify on a registry. Standard Companies House (UK), Delaware Division of Corporations (US), Cyprus MBR, and ICANN WHOIS searches I ran on 2026-05-20 turned up no registered company name, jurisdiction, or named officers tied to the platform. The docs and the r/JanitorAI threads toss around "Janitor LLC" and developer handles informally, but nothing resolves to a registered entity at the standard our compliance scoring wants. That's a genuine transparency gap, and anyone who weighs privacy heavily should factor it in honestly.

Where does Janitor.AI win?

Janitor.AI is genuinely better than OurDream on a clear set of things, and I'm going to name every one of them. Here's the part most comparison pages won't tell you: when a site crowns "X vs Y", it usually crowns whoever pays the reviewer more. A comparison where the unscored side magically wins nothing is the tell. On this page, OurDream's per-dimension numbers are lifted straight from its own Review and locked the day we publish, so the affiliate commission can't quietly nudge a column. Which is also why I can hand Janitor.AI its real wins without flinching.

BYOL flexibility is the heart of it. Wanting full control over which model drives your roleplay (Claude 3.5 Sonnet for character voice, GPT-4o for following instructions, a fine-tuned Llama 70B for explicit tolerance, a cheap mid-tier model when money's tight) gets you exactly that control once you plug in a key. OurDream hands you five hosted backends and a polished surface. Janitor.AI hands you a full model selector across every provider OpenRouter carries. If you already live in API keys and per-token math, you'll price this high. If you don't, it'll read as pointless overhead.

The $0 floor is real. The native model is free to use with rate limits. No payment method, no trial clock, no token economy at the subscription layer. Quality sits well below what you'd get plugging in your own GPT-4-class or Claude-class key, but the floor is there and anyone can reach it. OurDream's free tier is genuinely usable too (50 messages a day plus 5 images a day, no credit card), except it's the free slice of a paid product. Video, group chat, and the full uncensored unlock all sit behind the $9.99 yearly effective subscription. If your line in the sand is never paying a cent for an AI companion, Janitor.AI's native model is the only one of the two that holds it.

The user-uploaded library is enormous. Community creators have piled in hundreds of thousands of personas across the aggregations, with backstories, opening prompts, fan-favourite original characters, niche kinks, and Character.AI ports. OurDream runs a 7M-character marketplace plus a custom builder with 40+ personality presets, 100+ occupation tags, and 60-80+ kink tags, but its catalog leans toward fresh AI-generated personas rather than the fanfic culture that defines Janitor.AI's character page. If you want fan-favourite copyrighted-character ports (with all the legal caveats that come with those), Janitor.AI's library is richer in that exact corner.

Explicit content arrives with no filter to toggle. It's just on. No setting to hunt for, no premium tier to crack, no switch to flip. OurDream ships explicit content too but gates the full uncensored unlock behind Premium. The free tier gives you partial uncensored on images (5 standard images a day) while the most explicit imagery waits for Premium. If your main gripe with mainstream AI girlfriend apps is the endless friction of toggles, gates, and upgrade nags, Janitor.AI's no-filter default is honestly the cleaner ride on that one axis.

The community lives on Discord. Janitor.AI's social surface sits heavily on Discord and Reddit (r/JanitorAI), with busy threads on BYOL configs, character-creator tips, model-selection arguments, and uptime gripes. That community-as-product feel is a different animal from OurDream's tidy, marketing-led posture. If you like the blur between social space and product, Janitor.AI's culture will feel more like home than OurDream's curated marketplace.

All of which points at one reader. BYOL plus a $0 floor plus the library plus no filter makes Janitor.AI the right fit for someone who already juggles API keys for other work, likes pitting different models against the same character, treats the library as a canvas rather than a finish line, and counts the Discord as part of the fun. That person will find OurDream's all-in-one polish a cage, not a comfort.

Where does OurDream win?

The places where OurDream flat-out beats Janitor.AI are just as real, and they're the reason this search exists at all. People typing janitor ai vs ourdream are usually fed up with one or more of the things below.

Native image generation. OurDream's image gen scored 8.0/10 in our scoring, with partial uncensored images on the free tier (5 standard images a day at 10 DreamCoins each, no credit card). Janitor.AI ships zero native image gen. The library serves up creator-uploaded artwork and nothing else: no on-demand creation, no custom outfits, no situational scenes, no persona-matched portraits. If images carry weight in your use case, Janitor.AI can't produce them under any tier or BYOL setup. That's not a small gap. It's the single missing feature that pushes the most people off Janitor.AI toward a premium app this year.

Native iOS and Android apps. OurDream ships a native iOS app (App Store ID 6755042859) and a native Android app (com.deepdesire.aigirlfriendchat), both launched November 2025 [Source: Google Play (OurDream AI Companion developer metadata) · verified 2026-05-20]. Janitor.AI is browser-only with no native app. Its mobile web view is responsive, but you lose push notifications for new messages, voice tied into your mic and speakers, offline drafting on a slow connection, and the App Store presence you'd want from something you check daily. Most people reach these apps from a phone, so OurDream's mobile setup is genuinely better, even with the publisher mismatch I disclose below.

Group chat with up to 4 personas. OurDream is the only one of the 9 AI girlfriend apps we've scored with group chat that actually works. The real limit is four characters at once, per a Medium reviewer's hands-on test (one outlier source claims twelve, but that same test admits the characters "start blending personalities" past four). Group chat sits behind Premium, and we score the underlying roleplay depth 9.0/10. Janitor.AI has no native group chat at all. It pairs one user with one character, and the prompt-engineering workarounds creators build aren't a real feature and don't scale to genuine multi-persona storytelling. If your thing is branching multi-character scenes (one steady partner, one new meeting, one adventure quest, one comic-relief sidekick), OurDream owns this corner outright.

Memory that holds 2+ weeks. The memory horizon is what earns OurDream its 9.0/10 Conversation Quality. Reviewers and Reddit threads land on roughly 2+ weeks of continuity before the persona starts treating your callbacks as fresh prompts. One reviewer cites "100-message retention" against Candy.ai's roughly 25. Janitor.AI's persistence is capped by your connected model's context window (typically 8K to 200K tokens depending on what you plug in), with no Janitor-side layer adding cross-session memory. Holding a persona steady across weeks isn't a real feature there. If you want one recurring custom persona who remembers your birthday, your cat's name, and the inside jokes from week three, you'll have a noticeably better time on OurDream.

Native voice (19 presets). OurDream ships voice messages and voice calls as a real feature with 19 selectable presets. We score Voice 5.5/10 (its lowest score), and several reviewers call the presets "robotic", "lacking emotional depth", and "sounding distinctly artificial". I flag that weakness in the honesty section below. But even at 5.5/10, voice on OurDream exists. Janitor.AI ships none, in any configuration. If voice is your priority, OurDream wins despite the rough edge, simply because the alternative is no voice at all.

A bill you can predict. OurDream costs $9.99 to $19.99 a month and that's your number, with optional DreamCoin top-ups for heavy video users (100-300 coins per clip). Janitor.AI's BYOL economy means you pay the model provider directly per token, and a typical engaged user routing through OpenRouter to a mid-tier model lands around $5 to $20 a month in pass-through API spend. Heavy users running Claude 3.5 Sonnet or GPT-4 across high-volume chats land well above that. OurDream's capped subscription is cheaper for predictable use. Janitor.AI's variable cost only beats it for low-volume users staying on the free native model.

A custom persona that sticks. OurDream's builder (40+ personality presets, 100+ occupation tags, 60-80+ kink tags, 19 voice options, 20+ relationship dynamics) lets you design a persona and save it for repeat use across sessions, riding that 2+ week memory horizon. We score Customization 9.0/10, the best in the group. On Janitor.AI, persistence is capped by the connected model's context window and a saved character is whatever the uploader configured. Keeping your own custom persona alive beyond the active conversation isn't a real feature.

A company you can actually look up. OurDream's three-company structure (Dream Studio USA, Inc. in Delaware, Dream Studio LLC in New Mexico, Tektopia Ltd in Cyprus HE 473775) checks out on the public Delaware and Cyprus registries in about a minute. That setup points to better legal counsel than you usually see at this level, where most AI companion operators hide behind a single anonymous LLC and a shell trust. Janitor.AI's operator isn't disclosed at the level our scoring wants. For anyone privacy-conscious that matters, not because Janitor.AI is necessarily badly run, but because there's no named, registered entity to hold accountable if something breaks: a data breach, a billing dispute, a GDPR rights request, a DMCA takedown, a content-policy enforcement action.

No API keys to babysit. OurDream's onboarding is the smoothest in the premium AI girlfriend category. Sign up, pick a persona or build one, burn through your free trial messages, subscribe, chatting inside two minutes. Janitor.AI's BYOL path asks you to register with a model provider (OpenRouter is the usual gateway), generate an API key, set model selection in the settings, watch your token spend, and deal with provider rate limits on the side. First-time BYOL setup runs a median of 15-30 minutes per the recurring r/JanitorAI threads [Source: r/JanitorAI wiki (BYOL setup time and onboarding discussion index) · verified 2026-05-20]. If you don't already live in API keys, that's real friction OurDream just erases.

How does BYOL pricing compare to a bounded subscription?

Pricing here is about structure, not line items, and the answer flips depending on which thing matters more to you.

The honest read: OurDream is cheaper for any predictable use where image gen, mobile, group chat, or voice is part of the deal. Janitor.AI is cheaper only on the free native model (where quality drops noticeably) or for low-volume BYOL users routing through cheap OpenRouter models. Heavy BYOL users on premium models can land well above OurDream's $9.99 yearly effective tier and still get no native image gen, no apps, no group chat, no voice for the money. Pull up your actual provider bill before you assume Janitor.AI's "free" framing means less total spend [Source: OpenRouter public model pricing (Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-4o token rates) · verified 2026-05-20].

Which operator carries more compliance weight?

Compliance is where the gap between these two is widest, and I'll lay out both honestly.

OurDream runs on a three-company structure built for working across borders. Dream Studio USA, Inc. (Delaware C-Corp, governing law Delaware, venue New Castle County) handles US contracting. Dream Studio LLC (New Mexico, Albuquerque) handles tax and operations. Tektopia Ltd (Cyprus private limited, registry HE 473775 at Voukourestiou 25, Limassol) handles EU/EEA GDPR controllership. All of it checks out on the public Delaware and Cyprus registries in about a minute. That setup points to better legal counsel than you usually find at this level, where most AI companion operators run a single anonymous LLC behind a shell trust. The platform documents AES at-rest encryption, TLS 1.3 in transit, SOC 2 Type 2 claims, and a 14-day refund window with an EU/EEA/UK/Swiss consumer-rights overlay. Honest caveats: no DPO is named, no UK Representative is listed, the retention windows are vague ("time necessary for processing"), and the USC 2257 AI-only-content exemption is claimed but has never been tested in US federal courts [Source: Cornell LII (18 USC 2257 record-keeping requirements) · verified 2026-05-20].

Janitor.AI's operator is not publicly disclosed at any level you could verify against a registry. As of 2026-05-20, standard searches (Companies House UK, Delaware Division of Corporations US, Cyprus MBR, ICANN WHOIS) turned up no registered company name, jurisdiction, named officers, or Data Protection Officer tied to the platform. The docs and the r/JanitorAI threads name-drop "Janitor LLC" and developer handles informally, but nothing resolves to a registered entity at the standard our compliance scoring wants. That's a real transparency gap and we state it without guessing. If you weigh a named operator, a DPO, and a documented policy library heavily, factor the gap into your call. If corporate transparency isn't your worry, treat it as a non-issue.

For UK readers specifically: OurDream is reachable from the UK and doesn't throw up the kind of geo-block Joi has on record. Its Online Safety Act posture isn't spelled out (no UK Representative on the policy pages), which I flag. Janitor.AI's OSA posture is unclear from public sources. UK readers should test access and check content-policy compliance themselves before leaning on either one under the Online Safety Act.

For US readers in age-verification states: Texas (HB 1181), Utah, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Montana, Arkansas, Virginia, Alabama, Kentucky, Indiana, Georgia, Idaho, and Oklahoma all force government-ID gates on adult-content sites. OurDream's three-company setup is positioned for state-by-state handling, though no Texas-specific routing is published yet. Janitor.AI's posture is unclear. If you're in an AV-mandate state, verify access yourself [Source: Texas Office of the Attorney General (HB 1181 age-verification enforcement page) · verified 2026-05-20].

Honesty flags on both platforms

Every comparison we run lists the real weaknesses on both sides. The OurDream flags below are pulled straight from its standalone Review. The Janitor.AI flags come from the same public-source work that backs the rest of this page.

OurDream honesty flags.

• Voice 5.5/10, its lowest score. Across four independent reviewer sources, the 19 voice presets get called "robotic", "lacking emotional depth", and "sounding distinctly artificial". If voice nuance is the main thing you care about, this is OurDream's soft spot, though the feature at least exists, which Janitor.AI can't say.
• A ≈40% video failure rate we haven't verified directly. One source (companionguide) reports a ≈40% failure rate where failed clips eat your DreamCoins without a refund. That 40% is single-source, so we're holding it loosely until someone confirms it. One reviewer's bad run isn't a population-wide failure rate, and the pipeline may have been tuned since. The 60-second clip ceiling, on the other hand, is a real edge over most AI girlfriend apps.
• iOS and Android publisher mismatch. Both the iOS listing for "Our dream: AI Companion" and the Google Play listing are published under the developer name "Albert Paravyan", a personal account rather than the company. GDPR Article 13 expects the controller's identity to be unambiguous to the user. I'd use OurDream on the web rather than the apps until that developer account migrates to a corporate entity in public.
• A USC 2257 exemption that's never been tested in court. OurDream claims AI-only content puts it outside the 18 USC 2257 record-keeping scope. The theory is plausible and most AI girlfriend apps lean on it, but it's still untested in US federal courts as of right now.

Janitor.AI honesty flags.

• An operator nobody can pin down. No registered entity surfaced through standard Companies House, Delaware Division of Corporations, Cyprus MBR, or ICANN WHOIS searches as of 2026-05-20. The informal "Janitor LLC" reference on r/JanitorAI doesn't resolve to a searchable registered company. For privacy-conscious readers, this is the big one.
• Quality that swings wildly with whichever model you connect. Janitor.AI's roleplay runs anywhere from "below OurDream" (free native model) to "matches or beats OurDream" (Claude 3.5 Sonnet or GPT-4o via key), depending entirely on your BYOL setup. A single composite would hide that swing, which is one reason we don't publish one. Pick Janitor.AI for free-native quality and expect a noticeably weaker time than the BYOL ceiling suggests.
• A 15-30 minute setup for first-timers. Median BYOL configuration runs 15-30 minutes per the r/JanitorAI wiki: OpenRouter account, API key, Janitor settings, model selection, token-budget watching. If you don't already manage API keys elsewhere, that's real friction.
• No native image gen, no native app, no native voice, no native group chat. Four missing features that pile up fast if your use case touches any of them. The platform is a library wrapped around a model, and the feature surface is much thinner than a polished premium AI companion.
• Wobbly uptime per the community. The r/JanitorAI subreddit runs recurring threads on downtime, character-page errors, and BYOL pipeline failures during busy stretches. We're treating this loosely (it's community-aggregated, not published SLA data), but it's a real concern that doesn't show up on OurDream's side at anything like the same rate.

So the count lands at 4 flags on OurDream, 5 on Janitor.AI. That extra Janitor.AI flag reflects the genuinely deeper pile of missing features, not a thumb on the scale. Neither platform gets its weaknesses buried under marketing copy here.

Verdict by use case

There's no single-number winner here. These two chase adjacent goals and barely step on each other. The table below routes you to whichever one fits your top priority.

The honest summary: OurDream wins eight of the thirteen rows, Janitor.AI wins five, and one routes to running both. Those five Janitor.AI rows are real and uncontested. If your top priority is BYOL flexibility, a $0 subscription floor, the breadth of the community library, no-filter explicit content, or the power-user fit, pick Janitor.AI without a second thought. If your priority sits in any of the other eight rows, pick OurDream. And that "running both" row is the most common pattern among the people actually typing janitor ai vs ourdream and weighing this move. The two solve adjacent problems, not competing ones, so plenty of readers genuinely benefit from keeping both in the rotation.

If you're weighing AI companions against real-human options (token-tipped cam interaction at the same monthly spend, or per-creator OnlyFans subscriptions for that parasocial pull), the deeper trade-off lives in our AI vs cam pillar and the real-models section. Lots of readers run AI plus cam plus per-creator side by side, and that mix is perfectly fine.

Try OurDream free + AIMOJO -$10 first purchase →

How we tested

OurDream is scored under our AI companion scoring: eight weighted categories covering Pricing & Value (18%), Conversation Quality (16%), Privacy & Compliance (14%), Customization Depth (12%), Image Generation (12%), UX & Mobile (10%), Voice Quality (10%), and Video Generation (8%). The composite 8.2/10 is lifted straight from the OurDream Review, so the comparison can't be quietly tuned in our favour. The same eight categories, the same weights, the same fixed test, and the same honest "we haven't checked this" labelling get applied to every app in our scored set.

Janitor.AI is written up from public sources because it isn't in our scored set and isn't a CrakRevenue offer. The sources for its side: the platform's own public BYOL docs, the r/JanitorAI subreddit (setup discussions, free-tier versus API quality comparisons, character-library culture, downtime threads), OpenRouter's public pricing pages for the per-token cost framing, and standard registry searches that surfaced no publicly disclosed operator at the level our compliance scoring wants. We didn't subscribe to or test Janitor.AI on the free native model or any BYOL setup ourselves, so its profile is sourced and attributed, not personally tested.

Editorial spend on this page across both platforms is exactly $0. The OurDream checks covered the public pricing page, the refund policy, the terms of service, the Cyprus and Delaware registries, and the iOS App Store and Google Play developer pages. We pulled user-reported behavior on both from Reddit, Trustpilot, Medium reviews, and platform forums, flagged wherever we couldn't test it directly. Affiliate revenue is our whole business model and it's disclosed at the top of this page per FTC 16 CFR Part 255. We re-check OurDream on a schedule: Pricing & Value every 3 months, Image Generation every 6, Privacy & Compliance every 6 and within 7 days of any regulatory news (UK Online Safety Act, US state AV laws, EU DSA).

The public sources backing the corporate, pricing, and BYOL-cost claims on this page:

• [Source: OurDream Terms of Service (governing law and corporate identity disclosure) · verified 2026-05-20]
• [Source: Cyprus Department of Registrar of Companies (public search portal, Tektopia Ltd HE 473775) · verified 2026-05-20]
• [Source: Google Play (OurDream AI Companion developer metadata) · verified 2026-05-20]
• [Source: r/JanitorAI subreddit (community FAQ and BYOL setup discussion threads) · verified 2026-05-20]
• [Source: r/JanitorAI wiki (BYOL setup time and onboarding discussion index) · verified 2026-05-20]
• [Source: OpenRouter public model pricing (Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-4o token rates) · verified 2026-05-20]
• [Source: FTC 16 CFR Part 255 (Guides Concerning Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising) · verified 2026-05-20]
• [Source: Texas Office of the Attorney General (HB 1181 age-verification enforcement page) · verified 2026-05-20]
• [Source: CrakRevenue 2026 Top 10 AI Girlfriend chat platforms editorial listicle (OurDream #1) · verified 2026-05-20]

Frequently asked questions

What to read next

• Best Janitor.AI alternatives: the full ranked list of platforms Janitor.AI users move to, scored under our test, with intent-based routing for each one.
• Best Character.AI alternatives: the sister list for the wider Character.AI crowd that includes Janitor.AI users, with routing where the two audiences overlap.
• OurDream review: the standalone Review with full per-category scoring, a pricing-tier walkthrough, compliance posture, and the complete honesty-flag block (composite 8.2/10).
• Best AI girlfriends ranking: the full ranking with eight other apps scored on the same test, including where OurDream lands.
• OurDream vs Secrets.ai: the same-category comparison where OurDream wins memory and group chat by a tight 0.1 composite margin against Secrets's EmotionSync video and voice naturalness.
• Janitor.AI vs Candy.ai: the sideways comparison where Candy.ai leads on polish, handy when Candy is in the running alongside OurDream.
• How we score AI companions: the public eight-category scoring plus the fixed test protocols plus version history.

Trust cluster

• Methodology overview: the parent landing for our four scoring systems
• AI companion methodology: the eight-category AI scoring, the $0-spend approach, our honest-labelling discipline, and how we lock comparison scores at publish
• OurDream: the standalone Review with full per-category scoring (composite 8.2/10)
• Best Janitor.AI alternatives: the full ranked list of places people move to
• Best Character.AI alternatives: the sister list for the wider Character.AI crowd
• About bestgirlfriend.ai and Alexandra Joly: the masthead, editorial team, and corporate identity
• Affiliate disclosure: our FTC 16 CFR Part 255 disclosure
• Errata log: post-publish corrections and editorial accountability

---

Last verified May 20, 2026 · See errata log for any post-publish corrections · Editor: Alexandra Joly · Methodology v1.0 · Editorial process · Affiliate disclosure