My Dream Companion Review 2026: 4.6/10, Sold by the Day

Open My Dream Companion →

By Alexandra Joly · Senior Editor · See our editorial process and errata log

Is My Dream Companion worth it?

This page started with a failed search. I went looking for what My Dream Companion costs per month, the way anyone does before putting a card down, and the brand wouldn't say. There's no pricing page to open either: the obvious address returns a 404 and the real one is blocked from crawlers. So I pressed the buy button, because that's where a review earns its keep, and got a signup window instead of a payment screen. That's where this review stops, and I'll say so again in the pricing section.

The four amounts do exist, and they're not hiding in a vault. They're carried by the pricing configuration the brand serves anyone who isn't signed in, and on the card itself the only place a real number ever shows up is a small line reading Billed Monthly or Billed Annually. Everything above it is cents a day.

Then I read the pages competing on this query and it got worse. Of the eight I opened, one gives the yearly at $299.88 and another gives $302.95, which is eighty-three cents times three hundred and sixty-five. On the cheaper plan, one says $69.99 and another says $69.35. Two of the eight aren't even reviewing this website, they're reviewing a different one with a near-identical name, and two credit the whole thing to a company that appears nowhere in this site's legal pages. Eighty-three cents a day sounds like a coffee you round down. The configuration behind it says $299.88.

So that's what this review is. The amounts the brand's own configuration carries, the company that actually runs the place, and the things I couldn't verify said plainly as things I couldn't verify. If you want a companion with a track record on memory, go to our OurDream scorecard or the Candy.ai review.

What is My Dream Companion, and who actually runs it?

Start with the identity, because in this category it's the rarest thing on the table and because the competing results get it wrong. The imprint names Miracle AI UG (haftungsbeschränkt), Grolmanstraße 40 in Berlin, and prints two lines verbatim: Commercial register: HRB 231497, and Register court: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg [Source: My Dream Companion imprint (declared publisher, register number, registering court)]. The same entity appears in the terms, in the privacy policy and in the footer of every page served.

Now the part I'd rather say than dress up. bestgirlfriend.ai could not open an official German register. Five attempts, five technical failures, none of them an empty result. So that imprint declares a register number we were not able to open ourselves. What we did confirm, first-hand and on a primary source, is the VAT number: DE346705159 comes back valid on the European Commission's own checker [Source: European Commission VIES VAT number validation service]. Germany doesn't disclose the holder's name through that service, so it proves an active German VAT number exists, not that it belongs to this company. That's weaker than the confident sentence you'll read elsewhere on this query, and it's what we actually have.

The company history has the same footing, so it gets the same label. Third-party business databases put the first registration in July 2021 under a different name, and record a rename, a change of registered office and a complete change of management in June 2024. Three of those databases agree, which sounds like three witnesses and isn't: they reload from the same publication feeds. Two of them date the first registration to the 14th of July and the third to the 12th, so July 2021 is as precise as this gets. The domain was created in March 2024. When a review tells you this service has been live since 2021, it's reading a company's birth certificate and calling it the product's.

Share capital is 300 euros, the practical floor for this German company form and perfectly legal. The terms cap the operator's liability at whatever you paid in the previous six months, with a one-year contractual limitation period [Source: My Dream Companion Terms of Service (liability cap, limitation period, governing law)]. Put plainly: the counterparty holding your intimate conversations, and potentially a photograph of a face, carries 300 euros of capital and caps its exposure at half a year of subscription.

The terms also qualify the whole thing as a passive service, offered without actively targeting users anywhere outside Germany. That framing is what pushes local consumer law away, and it sits awkwardly next to sixteen translated language versions declared in the sitemap and an affiliate page selling worldwide reach. We don't adjudicate the legal question. The document says one thing and the site does another.

How much does My Dream Companion cost?

Where these four amounts come from, in plain language. They are the amounts carried by the pricing configuration My Dream Companion serves to a signed-out visitor. bestgirlfriend.ai made no purchase and opened no account. The buy button opens a signup window instead of a payment screen, so nothing on this page is a bank statement and nothing here describes what a card is charged [Source: My Dream Companion subscription page (plan and period grid, signed out)].

The wording above is careful for a reason. The subscription page doesn't serve the same grid to everyone: an A/B test drives its layout, and one anonymous render of it opened on Ultimate yearly and carried neither $11.99 nor $44.99. And a further tier is fully configured in what the site ships, flagged not to display on the paywall and carrying no price at all, so the public grid isn't the whole catalogue of offers.

Three details in that table deserve their own paragraph.

The daily price is computed on a thirty-day month, even for the yearly plan. Eighty-three cents a day is $299.88 divided by three hundred and sixty. Divide by an actual year and you get $0.82. The gap is small and the mechanism is the point: the daily figure is a marketing unit and not a rate, which is why multiplying it by 365 produces the $302.95 published elsewhere as if it were a real total. 0.83 × 365 = 302.95. Nobody measured that amount, it comes out of a calculator.

The Save 70% badge isn't a calculation on anything the brand charges. It's a fixed configuration value, identical on both tiers, anchored to a reference price of $20 a month for Premium and $85 a month for Ultimate. Neither figure is displayed anywhere on the site. Against the real monthly rates, yearly saves 51.4% on Premium ($143.88 against $69.99) and 44.5% on Ultimate ($539.88 against $299.88). Those are genuinely good discounts. They're simply not the ones on the badge.

The countdown has no campaign behind it. The discount banner carries a thirty-minute timer held in the browser's own storage, and the key is deleted when it hits zero, so the next page load starts a fresh thirty minutes. There's no campaign end date behind it. That banner renders only for a signed-in account without a subscription, so bestgirlfriend.ai never saw it: what we read is the configuration the site ships.

Then there's the coin economy sitting on top of the subscription. Packs run $9.99 for 100 coins up to $149.99 for 3,750, with stepped discounts that do check out to the tenth of a point, which works the coin price from $0.0999 down to $0.0400. The published terms state that each image, video or voice generation costs between 3 and 20 Dream Coins [Source: My Dream Companion Terms of Service (Dream Coins cost range per generation)], and that's the whole of the published price list. There's no per-action table anywhere. So I ended up counting coins off a button badge and reading a plan's own configuration, because the brand publishes no page that carries the information.

What that gives you. A voice minute runs roughly 8.3 coins on the bundle equivalences the brand publishes itself, so $0.33 to $0.83 depending on which pack you bought. Video is the one to be careful with, because the brand publishes no equivalence for it. The only figure that exists is the badge on the video generator, which reads 23 coins a clip, so $0.92 to $2.30. Note that 23 sits outside the 3 to 20 range the terms promise. That's their contradiction, not our arithmetic.

Which produces the least flattering line on this page. The 100 coins bundled into Premium monthly are worth $9.99 bought alone. The subscription is priced $11.99. The entry tier is, to within two dollars, a coin pack with unlimited texting attached. And the annual-coins argument only works on one tier: Ultimate yearly puts the allocation at $0.0312 a coin, under the cheapest pack on the shelf at $0.0400, while Premium yearly lands near $0.058, which is more expensive than both the 2,400 and 3,750 coin packs. If bulk coins are the reason you're going annual, that reason holds on Ultimate and fails on Premium.

There's no free tier bestgirlfriend.ai could confirm from the outside. The creator runs all six steps without an account and then stops dead at a signup wall, and the chat surface serves nothing until you log in. If free is the requirement, start from our roundup of the free AI girlfriend options instead.

Open My Dream Companion →

How do you cancel My Dream Companion, and what do you get back?

Cancel subscription is the first thing Google suggests after this brand's name, ahead of discord, reddit, apk, down and pricing. Autocomplete proves a query is typed, never how often, so treat that as an ordering. It still tells you something, and it tells you the pages competing on this term are answering a different question with four thousand words about features. The step-by-step, if you want it written out for any platform in this category, is in our guide to cancelling an AI girlfriend subscription.

The good news first, because it contradicts the usual scare story. There's a real self-service cancellation path in account settings, written into the terms, with no retention call and no email hostage-taking [Source: My Dream Companion Terms of Service (cancellation procedure and refund policy)]. On the archived public complaint surfaces, bestgirlfriend.ai found no unauthorised-charge report and no chargeback thread at all. What it did find is one documented billing grievance, from a regular user who complains that recent product changes all point at extracting more money. That's one, well below the bar where we'd call something a pattern. The brand's Discord runs past fifteen thousand members and we didn't go through its membership screen, so billing complaints voiced in there are outside what this page can see.

Now the parts that cost you money. The refund position is a flat no on paid subscriptions, with exceptions granted case by case and refusal expressly reserved. Cancel mid-period and the remainder is gone. A request that lands after the renewal has fired can be billed for that cycle. On the way out you get two screens built on loss framing, then a questionnaire before the unsubscribe button. Account deletion isn't available while a paid subscription is live, so leaving properly is a two-step exit.

The terms also carry a clause that's easy to miss and expensive to discover: a serious breach of the community rules leads to permanent account closure with no refund and no reinstatement. Whatever's left on the clock goes with it. Then the gap nobody on this query fills, the brand included: bestgirlfriend.ai found no published document that says what happens to unspent Dream Coins when a subscription ends, and no review of this brand documents it either. On a currency that sells for up to $149.99 a pack, that silence is worth noticing before you stock up.

The brand's own churn questionnaire, which it wrote itself, opens with two reasons in a row about cost, subscription price too expensive and image generation too expensive. That's the operator telling you what it expects to hear. The statement descriptor reads Miracle AI.

The terms never mention the fourteen-day statutory withdrawal right that European consumers have on distance contracts for digital services, in either direction, neither granting it nor documenting a waiver [Source: EU Consumer Rights Directive 2011/83/EU, right of withdrawal]. We're not resolving whether it applies. The document is silent on it, from an operator established inside the European Union.

Is My Dream Companion safe?

Let me do the credit side properly first.

The published prohibitions are among the more complete in this category. They cover minors explicitly, including non-real depictions, with a stated commitment to report to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, plus bestiality, coprophilia and direct-bloodline incest [Source: My Dream Companion Community Guidelines]. The same rulebook cuts against the marketing in two places. Non-consent is narrower than it looks: the blocked-content policy carries no non-consent clause at all, and the community guidelines cover it only for intimate imagery of real people, which means sextortion and the circulation of private images. And step-family scenarios are explicitly permitted, written three separate times across the policies and the creation screen. That's legal, it's the norm in this category, and a review praising the rigour of these rules without saying it would be lying by omission.

The creator's age field is a declared guardrail. It's required, it must be a whole number, and it's bounded at a minimum of 18 and a maximum of 100. Every character record served carries an age attribute, and the lowest among the featured ones was 18. We submitted no form, so what we're describing is a validation rule the page declares on the client, not a block we watched happen. A reviewer telling you there's no age control in the creator hasn't read the page. The interface also ships an error message that enumerates blocked categories, minors under 18, zoophilia, coprophilia, extreme violence and non-consensual sex. We never triggered it. bestgirlfriend.ai ran no generation of any kind, so the string exists in what the site serves, and we can't tell you a filter stops anything.

Payments are the other credit, and this is where bestgirlfriend.ai names names, because these are facts about the product under review. The checkout routes to Upgate and Shift4, the second a publicly listed processor. That is unusual here, where the gateway is normally impossible to name. Identity verification, when it triggers, runs through Didit, which handles the document and biometric liveness step, with the operator stating it doesn't keep raw biometric data or identity document images on its own servers. Infrastructure checks come back clean: cross-origin requests are locked to an allowlist, and no breach is on file for this domain.

Now the debits, in the order they'd cost you.

1. The privacy policy has measurable holes. No data protection officer is designated. No retention period is given in a number, only an open-ended formula. There's no mechanism cited for transfers outside the European Economic Area, no standard contractual clauses, no adequacy reference. There's no Californian section at all. The policy does openly state that a moderation team reads exchanges for legal compliance and that data feeds model improvement in anonymised or aggregated form, which is more candid than most [Source: My Dream Companion Privacy Policy]. If you want the general version of this problem, we keep a page on what AI companion apps do with your data.

2. The version stamp on that policy isn't telling the truth about itself. The header reads, verbatim, Last Modified August 03, 2024. The same document now carries a full section describing biometric handling and identity document processing by a named vendor. Those two facts coexist today and they're reproducible in one request. A document that governs biometric processing while its own version line stays frozen is a documentation hygiene failure, and nobody should round it down to a typo. We're not dating the moment that section appeared, because we didn't reopen the archive snapshots ourselves.

3. The declared processor list and the live one don't match, in both directions. Several advertising trackers named in the policy weren't found in the code the site serves, and that's as far as the measurement goes: a tag manager is loaded on the page, and a tag container can inject those pixels after consent, so absence from the served code isn't absence from the product. Meanwhile nine third parties are live and none is named in the policy: PostHog for product analytics, Sentry for error tracking, Google reCAPTCHA for anti-bot, Trackdesk and FirstPromoter for affiliate tracking, Supahub for the feedback portal, Cookie-Script for the cookie banner, BunnyCDN for media delivery, and Taboola, which is the one genuine advertising pixel running undeclared. The PostHog configuration is restrained, with autocapture and session recording both off and a European interface region, and the collection is proxied on the brand's own domain, which is normal practice we use ourselves. The problem isn't the tool. It's that a reader can't discover who receives the data from any document the brand publishes, and this page isn't going to reproduce that opacity while complaining about it. Three third-party connections, to Google Tag Manager, FirstPromoter and Trackdesk, are preloaded in the initial HTML before the consent banner gets an answer.

4. The age gate is decoration. The over-18 modal is client-side only. The full home page, catalogue and character biographies come back to a plain request with no cookie, no click and no consent. If you were relying on that banner to keep anything away from anyone, it doesn't.

5. A reassurance claim that doesn't match the implementation. The coin page's own metadata advertises, verbatim, secure payments via Stripe, whose published rules don't permit adult content. The payment code the site serves routes to Upgate and Shift4, and contains zero occurrences of Stripe. Either the claim is stale or it's inaccurate, and either way it's a trust line printed next to a payment button that doesn't describe what happens when you press it. The same site also manages to say both things about card security: its FAQ claims the providers comply with PCI DSS, while the terms list PCI compliance among the things expressly not warranted.

6. My Dream Companion's published content rules are not applied on the publisher's own product pages. Two of the brand's product pages promote an example prompt, with a one-click reuse button and a pre-generated image, whose subject sits squarely inside a category its own Community Guidelines forbid: that document bars minors including, in its own words, non-real depictions with human likeness such as art, AI-generated content, fictional characters, or dolls [Source: My Dream Companion Community Guidelines, prohibition on minors including non-real depictions]. A second promoted example on the same two pages falls into a category that none of the brand's published texts cover, because the blocked-content policy has no non-consent clause and the community guidelines reach non-consent only for real people [Source: My Dream Companion Blocked Content Policy]. We reproduce no prompt, no subject and no wording for either one, and we surface this without amplification.

7. A real tension between a feature and a legal statement. The realistic character style requires a face photo: the creator's own validation rule states that a face image is required for realistic style. Meanwhile the operator's 18 U.S.C. 2257 statement asserts that no real individuals are involved in creating the images on the site and that content is solely AI-generated, and the content removal policy describes any resemblance to a real person as entirely unintentional and coincidental. The guardrails exist and they're contractual: the upload zone warns against real individuals, and the terms make you warrant you have the consent of anyone depicted. But that protection rests on a user's own declaration, attached to a feature whose entire purpose is to move a real face onto a generated body, and the terms take a perpetual, irrevocable, sublicensable licence on whatever you upload. We didn't test the upload, because doing so would have meant sending a real person's face to this platform, and we don't do that.

The last item is a governance problem, and it's the kind of thing a reader spots before a reviewer does. The video page sells itself on no limits, no filters, censorship-free, anything goes. The same site publishes a list of things that are absolutely forbidden. Both can't be true, and a platform advertising the absence of rules while operating rules has decided which of the two statements is marketing.

How good is My Dream Companion at chat, images, voice and video?

I want to be blunt about the shape of this review, because the shape is the honesty. One of the pages competing on this term claims thirty days inside a platform whose domain is younger than the test it describes. Another claims fourteen days, forty hours, forty-five images, eight videos and twelve hundred messages, and credits the product to a company that doesn't run it. Most reviewers in this space won't tell you that, because this brand pays 30 to 40% lifetime revenue share to anyone who sends it a subscriber, and a fabricated hands-on converts better than an honest gap. We're an affiliate site too. The difference is that we'd rather post a lower score with our reasons than counter a fake test with a better fake test.

Conversation, 4/10. Memory is the brand's headline. The home page says the AI remembers past chats and learns from you, and that other bots forget who you are while this one doesn't. Against that claim there's no published retention window, no description of how it works, no evaluation, no sample. What exists publicly points both ways. One user running four paid platforms calls this the best of them for uncensored writing quality, with the immediate caveat that the better memory runs on coins. Another describes roleplays running to several hundred messages that hold, then start recycling responses. Against them, the sharpest complaint in the file is a comment left under a video tutorial on cancelling this subscription, describing characters who don't know what they look like or what's in the biography you picked them for, and who all say the same thing. It's one voice on one channel, so we're treating it as indicative, and it goes to the core of what you're paying for.

Images, 5/10. The generator is real and reasonably equipped: batches of 2 up to 32, pose, background and outfit controls, a free-prompt mode gated behind the paid tier. That control surface is genuinely above average for this category, which is why this sits at five and no lower. What we have no measurement of is output quality, and the only public accounts are negative: a prompt-adherence complaint and, more specifically, a report that for an existing character the generator returns images it had already produced. Both of those come from the same channel, so treat the pattern as indicative. Either way we're not scoring an image engine we haven't driven.

Voice, 4/10. Six voice personas are offered. Minutes bill in coins at roughly 8.3 a minute on the brand's own bundle equivalences, which works out to $0.33 to $0.83 a minute depending on your pack. On quality we have nothing at all: no sample, no independent account, no test of our own. Four is what this scores on the evidence we do have, which is a thin feature that costs money on top of a subscription.

Video, 4/10. Clips run 5, 10 or 15 seconds, in portrait or landscape, with two style presets and two quality settings. The ceiling is 720p, which the interface states itself, and that sits oddly against a page selling hyper-realism. The generator's badge reads 23 coins a clip, so $0.92 to $2.30. Untested by us.

Where the product is genuinely more than a shell, and this deserves saying because plenty of affiliate storefronts around here are not: the catalogue mixes house characters with community creations, the six-step creator works end to end up to the signup wall, there's a creator studio, a per-character edit surface, an internal currency, and sixteen language versions whose body text is genuinely translated. Whatever else is true, somebody built this.

How customizable is My Dream Companion?

This is the surface the affiliate offer sells, so it's worth being precise about it. It works, it's more than a screenshot, and it's middling. You can build a look. Around forty appearance decisions is enough to get somewhere specific and well short of what the depth leaders in this category expose. The three genders cover female, male and futanari, so the creator works whether you're building a girlfriend or a boyfriend, which isn't universal in this space. The four relationship archetypes are thin, and the personality layer, if it exists, lives behind the signup wall.

The age field is worth carrying with you, because the competing results get it wrong in the other direction: it's declared required, validated as an integer, and it refuses anything under 18. That's a real guardrail on paper, and it's precisely what makes the storefront problem in the compliance section an inconsistency between two surfaces of the same site.

Not everybody sees the same form, either. The page ships two variants of the creator with different labels for the same axes, so a screenshot from another review may genuinely not match what loads for you. That's an ordinary split test, and it does mean the option counts you read anywhere, ours included, are the counts of one variant.

Is My Dream Companion the same as dreamcompanion.io or the Dream AI Companion app?

This is the service no competitor on this query performs, and it's the reason a chunk of what you'll read is worthless to you. Several reviews titled Dream Companion are reviewing a different website. The publisher name that gets repeated from page to page, as though it were established fact, belongs to a company with nothing to do with the site this review covers, and it's contradicted by a German imprint carrying a register number. When three reviews agree on the same wrong publisher and the same wrong launch year, that's one copy with two photocopies.

The brand doesn't own the clean version of its own name. It sits on mydreamcompanion.com while the bare dreamcompanion.com and .ai are parked and for sale, and while a mobile app with a near-identical title runs under a different publisher on both app stores. Which brings us to the flat correction: there is no official My Dream Companion mobile app. The product's own web manifest describes an installable web app and nothing else, and neither store carries a listing from this publisher. Any review telling you to download it from the App Store is describing somebody else's product. Use the site in your phone's browser.

What does Reddit say about My Dream Companion?

The Reddit corpus is the finding of this section, and it comes with its method attached. bestgirlfriend.ai rebuilt it from a public archive of Reddit comments, paginated to exhaustion, which gives 360 unique comments naming the brand between August 2024 and August 2026, from 241 distinct accounts. That kind of archive can be incomplete, especially on deleted content: eleven of the hundred archived posts already carried a Removed by moderator marker, so read what follows as a floor and not a census.

Three fabrication signatures stack on top of each other. Seventy-one of those 360 comments, spread over 66 distinct accounts, carry U+2064, an invisible character, slipped between the letters of words like best, ultimate and generator, and every one of the 71 names the brand. No human writes that way; it exists to get past keyword filters. Second, coordinated bursts: one day alone carries 31 comments from 23 accounts across 15 different subreddits, with two more days carrying 13 each, all reading off the same two templates, the add-to-the-list and the short testimonial. Third, forty-nine archived posts from three accounts carrying an identical body of text with campaign tracking parameters attached, which makes them tracked acquisition, whoever paid for it.

We're not going to tell you who commissioned any of it, because the evidence doesn't reach that far. Promotional comments using this filter-evasion technique circulate around this brand the way they circulate around its competitors, one of the invisible-character comments we found is promoting a rival platform, and neighbouring posts carry other people's affiliate parameters. The manipulation is established. The sponsor is not, and a named German company doesn't get accused on a pattern that belongs to a whole ecosystem.

What survives the clean-up is thin but readable, and it's split. In favour: real writing quality on uncensored roleplay, with the caveat that the better memory consumes coins. Against: responses that start repeating after a long session, and a daily user, the most favourable voice in the whole corpus, complaining that recent changes all point at extracting more money.

Trustpilot is the other public surface, and four reviews can't produce a meaningful rating. I'm not going to pretend 2.8 out of 5 means anything at that volume. That number is Trustpilot's weighted score, which factors recency, volume and profile age, and it's why it doesn't match the distribution: half at one star and half at two stars averages 1.5. Publishing the 2.8 without that sentence would mislead in both directions. The distribution is the signal. A company that claims its profile and ends up with four reviews, all negative, none answered, hasn't asked its happy customers to show up there. The most recent of the four dates from 24 May 2026 [Source: Trustpilot profile for www.mydreamcompanion.com (four reviews, weighted score, distribution, company reply status)].

The official Discord runs past fifteen thousand members, with an age-gated membership screen, and has been live since spring 2024. We didn't go through that screen, so whatever is being discussed in there, billing complaints included, is outside what this review can see. That's a limit of this page and not evidence of anything.

Should you subscribe to My Dream Companion?

What we did not verify ourselves, and what we used instead. Four of the eight categories above were scored without an account, because every one of them lives behind a paid login, and each one is listed here with its reason. Conversation Quality: no session was run, so the score rests on the brand's published claims and on independent user accounts, and we exchanged no messages of our own. Image Generation: image generation requires a paid tier, so the score rests on the public control panel and on third-party reports of the output, not on images we generated. Voice: no voice sample was played, so the score rests on the six personas the creator exposes and on the coin cost the brand publishes, and we heard nothing. Video Generation: no clip was produced, so the score rests on the generator's own settings panel, its stated 720p ceiling and its coin badge, and we rendered no footage. Two more things we describe without testing: the character creator's age rule is a validation string the page declares, since we submitted no form, and the content filter's error message exists in what the site serves, since we triggered no generation. Those four categories still count at full weight in the 4.6, because refusing to score them would flatter the platform and tell you nothing. Based on: the brand's published pages and its served configuration, its legal documents, the European Commission VAT checker, third-party company databases, a Trustpilot profile, a public Reddit comment archive, a video comment, the Discord invite data and both app stores.

Subscribe if you've read the real amounts on this page and they still work for you. The honest case is a legitimate one: the operator is a named European company with a register number and a working VAT number on its own imprint, the creation flow works, sixteen languages are genuinely translated, the age rule in the creator is declared and bounded, the payment providers are named and serious, and the cancellation path is self-service with no phone call. In a category full of anonymous operators and dead-end support addresses, none of that is nothing. Go monthly first at $11.99 on Premium and find out whether the memory claim holds for you before committing to a year, and treat the Save 70% badge and its thirty-minute clock as the decoration they are.

Wait, or pick something else, if what you want is the thing this platform advertises loudest. Long-term memory is the whole pitch and there's no public evidence for it, while the sharpest complaint on the open channels is that characters don't remember their own description. If continuity is the point for you, go to our OurDream scorecard or the Candy.ai review.

Skip it outright if you need a documented compliance surface before you pay. No data protection officer, no retention periods, no transfer mechanism, a privacy stamp that hasn't moved while the document grew a biometric section, nine unnamed live processors, and a platform that advertises the absence of rules while publishing a list of them. If that list is the part that worries you, what AI companion apps actually store is the wider version of the same question. Skip it too if you want a native mobile app, because there isn't one and anybody telling you otherwise is describing a different company's software.

And whatever you decide, don't decide it from a price per day. The amounts are $11.99, $69.99, $44.99 and $299.88, and the one on the right comes back around in twelve months without the purchase surface ever having said so.

Open My Dream Companion →

Frequently asked questions

Related reading

• Our ranked AI girlfriend short-list: every platform we score, on the same eight categories, if this one is not the fit.
• Candy.ai's full scorecard: the reference on compliance documentation in this category, with a named operator and a designated data protection officer.
• OurDream's full review: the alternative to consider if long-term memory is the reason you were shopping here.
• The free AI girlfriend options: where to start if you are not ready to pay, since this platform has no free tier.
• How to cancel an AI girlfriend subscription: the exit path, written out for any platform in this category.
• Are AI companions safe?: the category-level version of the compliance questions above.
• How we score AI companions: the eight categories, the fixed weights, and how we score a category we could not test.

---

See our errata log for any post-publish corrections · Editor: Alexandra Joly · How we score · Editorial process · Affiliate disclosure