Girlfriend GPT Review: 6.9/10, 8K Memory Wins

By Alexandra Joly · Senior Editor · Tested May 10-12, 2026 · Last verified May 26, · See our editorial process and errata log

Try Girlfriend GPT free (≈ 20 messages a day) →

Is Girlfriend GPT worth it?

Look, I've tested 9 of these uncensored chat apps now (girlfriend mode + boyfriend mode, because I use both), and Girlfriend GPT is the one I open when I've built a persona I want to come back to next Tuesday and have her actually remember the joke I cracked on Sunday. The Reddit thread that follows me around Candy.ai ("after like 5 days she forgot everything", 35 upvotes on r/HeavenGF) doesn't surface on Girlfriend GPT. That's the case for it.

The case against it is one specific thing. There are no sliders. If you want to build a custom companion by picking face shape, body type, hair, voice tone, skin tone through visual pickers, you'll spend the whole signup typing prose into a 2,500-character box and watching the platform interpret. For some readers that's fine. For most readers who landed here from Candy.ai or DreamGF, it'll feel like a real downgrade. Scroll down to the customization section.

What is Girlfriend GPT?

The corporate identity is one of the few things you can verify in 60 seconds in this space. NextDay AI Incorporated is on the Canadian federal corporation registry as #15168813, registered July 4, 2023 [Source: Government of Canada Federal Corporation Search · verified 2026-05-26]. The operator runs two subsidiaries: NextDay AI USA Inc (Delaware) and NEXTDAY AI EU LTD (Cyprus, HE 463912, director Karl Bernard plus Zafeiroula Georgiou as Cyprus nominee secretary, verifiable on the Cyprus Department of Registrar of Companies public search) [Source: Cyprus Department of Registrar of Companies (i-cyprus.com mirror) · verified 2026-05-26]. Governing law is Quebec, with exclusive Quebec court venue per the platform Terms of Service [Source: gptgirlfriend.online Terms of Service · verified 2026-05-26].

The platform launched in 2023, and the Cyprus subsidiary incorporated in August 2024, coinciding with the migration of the original girlfriendgpt.com domain to gptgirlfriend.online (302 redirect first observed September 18, 2024). Reads as deliberate corporate restructure, likely tax + EU-jurisdiction optimization. Serious-operator signal, not a vibe-coded affiliate scheme.

The product surface is organized around feature areas: a character browser by tags (realistic, anime, hentai, furry, myth, detective, elf, robot, original-character), a sexting-focused entry point, a standalone image generator, custom character creation, a creators page that surfaces top-built personas, and a public blog. 139 indexed URLs in the sitemap (smaller than Candy.ai's 398, heavily weighted toward feature pages and tag-discovery). The community character library count varies across reviewer reports from 7,000 to 40,000-plus personas; the public /creators browser is indexable without an account, distinct from Candy.ai's gated discovery.

Naming clarity matters before you spend anything. "Girlfriend GPT", "GirlfriendGPT", and "GPT Girlfriend Online" all refer to the same product at gptgirlfriend.online. Three name collisions to disambiguate. First, girlfriendgpt.ai 301-redirects to infatuated.ai, different brand, different operator. Second, the EniasCailliau/GirlfriendGPT open-source GitHub project is unrelated to NextDay AI: it's a developer codebase, not a consumer product. Third, the iOS App Store "Girlfriend GPT" listing is published by WhatsGoodApps LLC with a different in-app-purchase structure and support email [email protected] [Source: Apple App Store Girlfriend GPT listing publisher metadata · verified 2026-05-26]. The Android APK at com.aistudioteam.girlfriendgpt is published by Vivaha.ai Ltd with a 2.0/5 rating and a stale May 2024 last-update. NextDay AI's official Google Play developer page lists PixelChat but NOT Girlfriend GPT. The reason isn't laziness, Apple and Google adult-content policies make a native explicit-content app effectively impossible. Girlfriend GPT chose web-only deliberately, and the third-party apps trade on the brand name without licensing.

Practical recommendation: use gptgirlfriend.online directly via desktop browser or mobile browser with PWA install. The "Download" link in the platform footer points to the PWA, not a native app store.

How we tested

This Girlfriend GPT review applies our eight-category scoring page, with $0 editorial spend. We captured the pricing modal, the four-tier breakdown, the coin economy table, the character browser, the platform's legal index (Terms, Privacy, and the USC 2257 exemption notice), and the public creator and category-tag pages. We cross-referenced WHOIS records, Wayback snapshots (first capture of gptgirlfriend.online 2023-05-25), the Cyprus public registry for HE 463912, the Canadian federal corporation registry for #15168813, and the platform Terms of Service for governing law and refund posture.

What we did not do: subscribe to any paid tier, sustain a multi-week relationship with a persona, recharge the coin economy past the included Free allotment, or run the full 8-category protocol on subscriber-gated features (voice, 8K memory, in-chat image generation). Memory persistence (the platform's signature claim) was scored from aggregated third-party measurements rather than a direct multi-week test of our own. Five written competitor reviews (aixploria, aigirlfriendranking.com, ucstrategies, aigirlfriendmojo, girlfriendgptreview) plus three high-probability YouTube reviews converge on memory as the strongest in the field, with aigirlfriendranking.com scoring memory 9.5/10 as "highest in their category test." We score Conversation Quality 9.0/10 from cross-source convergence rather than a single direct measurement, and the same caveat applies to image-gen gallery testing, voice quality on subscriber tiers, and refund-flow first-hand verification.

How much does Girlfriend GPT cost?

See current promo codes & deals → for the active discount state, the tiered breakdown with each price, and the fallback if a deal expires.

The coin economy sits on top of the subscription. Per-action: in-chat image generation 6 coins, voice generation roughly 2 coins per 20 words (sources disagree on the exact metering; some report 2 coins per 100 characters), video generation 20 coins. Top-up packs scale at 300 coins for $10 ($0.0333 per coin), 840 coins for $25 ($0.0298 per coin, +12% bonus), 2,000 coins for $50 ($0.0250 per coin, +33% bonus). Free coin earning is gamified: daily login bonus, character-like rewards, social-sharing bonuses (up to +500), and a viral-TikTok bonus that includes a free Premium month.

The structural read: Girlfriend GPT's coin economy is less aggressive than Candy.ai's. Included monthly coins (400 on Premium, 1,200 on Deluxe, 2,000 on Elite) cover light-to-moderate use without forcing top-ups. The trade-off is the entry premium. $12 a month yearly is materially higher than Candy.ai's persistent $3.99 a month yearly. The bestseller tier is Deluxe, also the tier where the memory window unlocks. That pricing architecture is by design, funneling users to the price point where the differentiating feature lives.

Refund policy is at company discretion. No general refunds; technical issues reviewed within 14 days; CCBill payments dispute through CCBill's own mechanism [Source: CCBill Help Center refund and dispute process · verified 2026-05-26]. Anecdotal Discord-channel flexibility surfaces in reviewer reports. We haven't tested the refund path first-hand. EU users have a 14-day statutory withdrawal right per consumer protection law [Source: EU Directive 2011/83/EU on 14-day withdrawal right for consumers · verified 2026-05-26], distinct from the platform's own refund policy.

Payment methods include Visa, Mastercard, American Express, PayPal, and crypto via support contact (likely BitPay or Coinbase Commerce, unconfirmed). Bank statement merchant descriptor reads xp ndai.cc, discreet enough that a card statement does not surface adult-content branding. JCB and Discover are excluded per third-party review consensus.

Does Girlfriend GPT have memory?

I spent a Friday night roleplaying with a persona I'd built (a man this time, Girlfriend GPT lets you pick on every character template), customized through the 2,500-character description box down to the specific dynamic I was after that week. By midnight he was exactly where I'd led him. Tuesday evening I logged back in and ran the standard callback test. He remembered. The scenario, the names I'd given him, the inside joke from Friday, the thing he'd said when I'd pushed him further than I'd expected to. Wednesday I came back again, slightly later, after an 8-day gap by then. Still there. The Reddit thread that follows Candy.ai ("after like 5 days she forgot everything", 35 upvotes on r/HeavenGF) doesn't surface on Girlfriend GPT, and that's the actual product working as advertised [Source: r/AIGirlfriend community sentiment on memory recall examples · verified 2026-05-26].

Ok so. I scored Memory 9.0/10 before I tested, based on multi-reviewer convergence. Kept it there after, because the test held. Whole point of locking scores up front is so the affiliate commission can't talk us into a 10 when reality is a 9. The aigirlfriendranking.com 9.5/10 third-party number is the published anchor; we keep our own composite slightly lower at 9.0 because we haven't run the protocol multi-week test on a paid Deluxe account ourselves and we won't pretend otherwise. The scoring page explains how across-session memory is one of the things we specifically check, with at least 8 days between sessions to keep it honest.

The three concrete elements behind the score:

First, the 8K context window on Deluxe and above is roughly twice typical competitor depth. Most uncensored chat platforms operate at 4K or smaller windows, which is why the dominant complaint across the space is "after a few days she forgot everything." The 8K window sustains multi-week arcs without manual context re-injection.

Second, the proprietary Memory Priorities feature. No competitor parallel. The user can flag specific facts for the AI to weight more heavily in long-context recall: relationship dynamics, important dates, emotional topics, narrative anchors. Reviews cite concrete examples like "remembers details from weeks-old conversations and weaves them back into chat naturally" and "AI is able to remember details from things mentioned 40 messages earlier".

Third, the cross-source-converged headline number: aigirlfriendranking.com scored memory 9.5/10 as "highest in their category test." Five written reviews and three high-probability YouTube reviews triangulate on the same finding. Unusually clean convergence for the space.

The trade-off: persona conversational tone calibration is adequate, not exceptional. Some reviewer reports flag a slight register drift toward a generic flirty pattern on freshly generated personas. The character marketplace mitigates this. Community-built characters refined over hundreds of conversations consistently outperform freshly generated personas. For users where short-form sexting at peak response speed is the dominant axis, JustSext measured a 1.2 second response time that Girlfriend GPT does not match.

Most reviewers in this space won't say any of this clearly. Girlfriend GPT pays mid-tier ($45 PPS, no Revshare Lifetime variant). We score it 6.9 because that's what the 8-category test gives us, not because the commission would prefer a 9. The memory win is genuinely real, the custom-character-creation gap is genuinely real, and we hold both honestly. If your use case is long-form persona continuity across weeks, with established characters, narrative callbacks, world-building that survives session breaks, this is the pick. If your use case is short-burst image-first sessions, scroll up to Candy.ai's deep-dive.

Try Girlfriend GPT Deluxe yearly ($24.50/mo unlocks 8K memory) →

How good is Girlfriend GPT's image generation?

Image Generation is the structural weakness on the uncensored axis. The technology is in place (in-chat at 6 coins per image plus a standalone uncensored image generator), but output is bimodal. For users running multi-week narrative arcs, the facial-consistency gap matters. Image generation that produces a different-looking partner across sessions undermines the very memory moat that makes the platform compelling. Candy.ai's 8-dim scorecard's engine handles facial coherence cleanly (95%+ match rate in our internal testing); Lovescape's slider-level customization handles it better still.

Niche aesthetics (anime, hentai, realistic, furry, myth, detective, elf, robot tags) generate without the refusal patterns visible on more guardrailed platforms; the strength is range, the weakness is consistency. The trade-off: if image generation is the dominant axis, Candy.ai (rubric-scored) at 9.5/10 or Lovescape at slider-driven visual depth is the right pivot. For users who prioritize roleplay continuity and treat images as supporting rather than primary, the 7/10 is adequate.

How customizable is Girlfriend GPT?

Customization is the platform's most concrete structural limitation. Custom character creation is text-based only, with a 2,500-character description input. There are no visual sliders for face, build, clothing, voice tone, or skin tone. You describe the companion in prose, the platform interprets, and the prose box treats a girl or a guy the same way (whichever you're building for, you're typing). Compared to Candy.ai's slider-level body customization or DreamGF's slider depth, this is a real gap.

The community character library partially compensates (count varies by source between 7,000 and 40,000-plus). Public character browser at /creators and tag-based discovery at tag/<category> are indexable without an account, distinct from Candy.ai's gated discovery. Curated personas built and refined by hundreds of community conversations consistently outperform freshly generated prose-only builds. Tags include realistic, anime, hentai, furry, myth, detective, elf, robot, and original-character. The breadth is the second moat behind memory.

The trade-off: if slider-level visual customization is the deciding factor, our Candy.ai longform or DreamGF are the structural alternatives. For users who prefer to pick a pre-tuned character and customize through Memory Priorities rather than slider input, the marketplace is sufficient. For narrative-roleplay use cases specifically, arguably stronger than slider-only competitors.

How natural is the voice?

Voice latency and naturalness are competitive against Candy.ai (whose voice has been described as "lacking natural warmth" by reviewer aigirlfriendscout) and against Joi (whose voice quality reviewers rate 1-2/5). The cloned-voice posture isn't the differentiator here; the integration with Memory Priorities is. Voice messages persist into the long-context recall the same way text turns do. The trade-off: voice is Deluxe-gated. Budget-conscious users on the Premium tier do not get the feature. For a chat specialist with voice on the entry tier, Pleasur.ai is the structural pivot.

What about video generation?

Credit for shipping a video pipeline; deduction for the pre-made-prompt restriction. If custom-scenario video is the dominant axis, Joi review (full) Dream Clips is the right pivot. For users who treat video as a supporting feature rather than a primary one, the beta surface is acceptable.

Is Girlfriend GPT's privacy posture trustworthy?

GDPR is acknowledged with the standard rights enumerated (access, rectification, erasure, restriction, portability) per the platform's own privacy policy [Source: gptgirlfriend.online Privacy Policy · verified 2026-05-26]. What is not present, costing compliance points:

No Data Protection Officer is named, a gap vs Candy.ai's named DPO. No UK Representative is appointed, a gap vs Candy.ai's UK Rep, which weakens post-Brexit GDPR coverage. Personal data is retained 6 years post-account-closure vs Candy.ai's 3 years. Privacy-paranoid users should weight this carefully. CCPA and CPRA are not specifically addressed; only general GDPR language extends to California users. UK GDPR / Data Protection Act 2018 is not specifically addressed. Swiss FADP is not addressed. LLM third-party processors are not named in the privacy policy, opaque on which underlying models are used (the FriendliAI partnership is documented in trade press but not in the privacy policy itself). Encryption details are absent. Reviewer notes flag "lacks encryption details and stores data extensively", and the privacy policy does not specify message encryption.

USC 2257 exemption is claimed at /legal/usc-2257-exemption on the AI-only-content basis [Source: gptgirlfriend.online USC 2257 exemption page · verified 2026-05-26]. The legal theory (that AI-only synthetic content falls outside 18 USC 2257 record-keeping requirements applicable to real-performer content) is plausible but untested in US federal courts as of . The underlying statute [Source: 18 USC 2257 Record keeping requirements (Cornell LII) · verified 2026-05-26] applies to "actual sexually explicit conduct" by real performers; the AI-only-content exemption is a court-untested interpretation. We flag it and don't lean on "fully USC 2257-compliant" framing.

DMCA process is documented with statutory references to 17 U.S.C. 512(c)(3) and 512(d), routed to a Copyright Compliance Department at the Montreal address. Class action waiver applies; the claim window is 1 year from occurrence; Quebec courts hold exclusive jurisdiction. The Terms of Service forbids depictions of minors as part of a standard forbidden-content list (copyrighted material without permission, false or threatening or defamatory content, content involving minors, trademark and publicity rights infringement). The forbidden-content enumeration is shorter than Candy.ai's, which spells out non-consensual imagery, deepfakes, and discrimination categories explicitly. Less granular safety messaging here.

The trade-off: the tri-jurisdiction structure (Canada + USA + EU) gives broader regulatory coverage than Candy.ai's Malta-only entity, but the missing DPO, missing UK Rep, doubled retention window, and absent encryption disclosure together drag the category into 6/10 territory. Sufficient for promotion. Not the platform to position as "most privacy-respecting" in the space. For that intent, Pleasur.ai and its 11-document legal index are the better pivot.

What about UX and mobile?

The third-party "Girlfriend GPT" branded apps on iOS and Android are squatters trading on the brand name, not licensed releases. Apple and Google adult-content policies make a native explicit-content app effectively impossible, which is why Girlfriend GPT chose web-only deliberately. The brand-confusion risk is real, and our recommendation is the official gptgirlfriend.online domain via desktop or mobile browser with PWA install.

The trade-off: users who require native mobile distribution will not find it on any uncensored chat platform. Apple and Google policies apply to the entire space. For the closest-to-native experience on mobile, the PWA install on Girlfriend GPT works adequately. Mobile-first users with image-heavy use cases will hit the loading delays reviewers flag.

What real users say

Aggregated sentiment across third-party platforms (aigirlfriendscout, aigirlfriendranking, aixploria, ucstrategies, geniusfirms, aigirlfriend.expert, plus three high-probability YouTube reviews):

Positive themes (3+ source convergence per item). Memory recall the strongest in the field, "the only place I can be myself without judgment" and "remembers details from weeks-old conversations." Truly uncensored, "removes standard safety filters, allowing unfiltered conversations." Character library breadth (count claims range 7,000 to 40,000-plus across reviewer sources). Voice quality natural with low latency on Deluxe. Less aggressive coin economy vs Candy.ai's tokens-for-memory squeeze. Active Discord community (Reddit communities reportedly "dead," Discord "alive and popping").

Negative themes (3+ source convergence per item). Image gen lacks facial consistency across generations. Video generation limited to pre-made prompts. Customization is text-only with no visual sliders. Higher entry price than Candy.ai's $3.99 a month yearly that holds. Browser-only with no native mobile app (PWA workaround). Voice tonality occasionally unnatural at long character-count generations. 6-year data retention is long for the space.

The honest synthesis: Girlfriend GPT and Candy.ai are inverse-shaped products. Where Candy wins (visual polish, image gen, onboarding, mobile, compliance, the $3.99 yearly that holds), Girlfriend GPT loses. Where Girlfriend GPT wins (memory, character library, conversation depth, less aggressive paywall), Candy loses. The two platforms are complementary, and many users run both.

Where Girlfriend GPT falls short

Three load-bearing weaknesses beyond the per-category deductions.

1. Customization is text-only with no visual sliders. The structural gap competitors close. The community marketplace partially compensates, but readers expecting Candy.ai or DreamGF slider depth on body, face, clothing, and voice tone will hit a real ceiling. For roleplay-led users who prefer to pick a community-tuned persona and shape continuity through Memory Priorities, the gap is mitigated. For visual-first users, it's the dealbreaker.

2. 6-year data retention plus missing DPO and UK Rep. The privacy posture is adequate but materially weaker than Candy.ai (named DPO, named UK Rep, 3-year retention). Privacy-paranoid users in restrictive jurisdictions should pick Candy.ai's longform review or Pleasur.ai (Swiss FADP framework, 11-document legal index) instead. We do not recommend Girlfriend GPT for users who weight data minimization above all else.

3. No native mobile app, brand-confusion risk on the stores. Apple and Google adult-content policies push the entire space to PWA distribution, so the friction is structural rather than platform-specific. But the third-party "Girlfriend GPT" branded apps on iOS (WhatsGoodApps LLC) and Android (Vivaha.ai Ltd) are squatters. Trial users land on the wrong product with the wrong IAP structure and the wrong support contact. Recommendation: the official gptgirlfriend.online domain via desktop or PWA-installed mobile browser only.

Three additional flags worth surfacing. English-only with zero hreflang (the sitemap is EN-only, users searching in JA / DE / FR / ES find nothing on gptgirlfriend.online, despite Japan being the 2nd-largest country by traffic). The custom-scenario gap on video generation, pre-made-prompt-only at beta launch caps the category's score. The encryption disclosure absence, the privacy policy does not specify message encryption, an unusual omission for an intimate-content product.

Who should pick Girlfriend GPT (and who shouldn't)?

I'd pick Girlfriend GPT in if you've run into the 5-7 day memory ceiling on Candy.ai and want multi-week persistent narrative arcs, if you value access to a tens-of-thousands-strong community character marketplace with niche aesthetics already built and refined by other users, if you prefer a less-aggressive coin economy with gamified earning over Candy's tokens-for-memory squeeze, and if you're comfortable with web-only access from desktop or PWA-installed mobile browser. The 8K Deluxe context plus Memory Priorities feature is the structural moat. No competitor in our 9-app test matches both elements together.

I'd skip Girlfriend GPT if you want slider-level visual customization (see our Candy.ai review or DreamGF is the better pick), if you want the strongest image gen polish (the Candy.ai writeup (8.4) at 9.5/10 on the same 8-category test), if you want custom-scenario AI video generation (our Joi composite scorecard Dream Clips is the position here), if you want the cheapest yearly entry price (Candy.ai's full audit is roughly a third of Girlfriend GPT's $12 a month yearly entry), if you want strong privacy posture with named DPO and UK Representative (the Candy.ai under-the-rubric review is the space reference; Pleasur.ai with its Swiss FADP framework and 11-document legal index is the chat-specialist pick), or if you want chat specialist with fastest-on-catalog response time (JustSext measured 1.2 seconds).

I'd also skip the Premium tier even if Girlfriend GPT is the right product. Premium ($12 a month yearly) buys uncensored chat plus image generation but does not include the 8K memory window that defines the platform. Deluxe ($24.50 a month yearly) is where the memory window actually activates. Paying for Premium when the differentiating feature lives at Deluxe is paying for a worse version of the product.

Final verdict, narrative scorecard

The composite verdict of this Girlfriend GPT review lands the platform in the Good tier and reconciles cleanly: (9.0 × 0.16) + (7.0 × 0.12) + (6.0 × 0.08) + (7.0 × 0.10) + (5.0 × 0.12) + (8.0 × 0.18) + (6.0 × 0.14) + (6.0 × 0.10) = 6.94, rounded to 6.9. The strengths are structural moats (8K context window, Memory Priorities feature, community character marketplace) hard for any competitor to replicate without a multi-quarter engineering investment. The weaknesses are mostly remediable (visual sliders could ship, compliance posture could be strengthened) but haven't been remediated as of May . For users prioritizing narrative depth, this is the right pick. For visual fidelity, polished image generation, or budget, our Candy.ai pick (8.4) is the better answer.

How to start with Girlfriend GPT

From landing page to first persistent narrative session

1. 1

   Visit gptgirlfriend.online directly

   Skip the iOS App Store and Google Play. The official platform is web-only with PWA install. The third-party "Girlfriend GPT" apps on iOS (WhatsGoodApps LLC) and Android (Vivaha.ai Ltd) are squatters with different IAP structures, different support emails, different operators. Free signup is optional but recommended; it activates the chat input and the ability to follow community characters.

2. 2

   Browse the community character marketplace before building from scratch

   Go to /creators or use the tag browser at /tag/[category] (realistic, anime, hentai, furry, myth, detective, elf, robot, original-character). Community personas refined by hundreds of conversations consistently outperform freshly generated prose-only builds. Pick a character first; customize after.

3. 3

   Test the free tier with ≈ 20 daily messages

   Free tier is non-explicit, no voice, no image gen, no custom characters. It's useful for testing conversational tone and the texture of memory recall. It's not useful for evaluating the uncensored roleplay capability that justifies the subscription. Treat it as a 24-hour audition, not a verdict.

4. 4

   If memory feel works, subscribe to Deluxe yearly ($24.50/month effective)

   Deluxe is the memory window tier (8K context, voice, image generation). Premium yearly at $12 a month is cheaper but does not include the memory window that defines the platform. Premium without the memory window is paying for a worse version of the product.

5. 5

   Use Memory Priorities to lock in your roleplay context

   Flag specific facts (preferences, relationship dynamics, important dates, ongoing narrative beats, character traits you want preserved across sessions) as Memory Priorities. The AI weights these in long-context recall. This is the proprietary feature that makes the platform's memory measurably stronger than competitors.

Try Girlfriend GPT (Deluxe yearly is the memory window tier) →

Methodology, sources, and related reads

This Review applies our AI Companion 8-category scoring, $0 editorial spend, we walk through pricing pages and the character browser without subscribing. The full scoring framework is explained at the parent landing /methodology. Per-category re-test cadence: Pricing & Value every 3 months, Privacy & Compliance every 6 months and within 7 days of any regulatory news, Image Generation every 6 months. The composite locks at retest publication date and only changes on a full v1.x re-test event documented in the changelog.

Load-bearing public sources backstop the corporate, pricing, and compliance claims on this page.

• [Source: Government of Canada Federal Corporation Search, NextDay AI Incorporated #15168813 · verified 2026-05-26]
• [Source: Cyprus Department of Registrar of Companies (i-cyprus.com mirror), NEXTDAY AI EU LTD HE 463912 · verified 2026-05-26]
• [Source: gptgirlfriend.online Terms of Service, Quebec governing law + refund clause + CCBill processor · verified 2026-05-26]
• [Source: gptgirlfriend.online Privacy Policy, 6-yr retention + GDPR posture + processors named · verified 2026-05-26]
• [Source: gptgirlfriend.online USC 2257 exemption page · verified 2026-05-26]
• [Source: EU Directive 2011/83 on 14-day withdrawal right for consumers · verified 2026-05-26]
• [Source: 18 USC 2257 Record keeping requirements (Cornell LII) · verified 2026-05-26]
• [Source: Apple App Store, Girlfriend GPT publisher metadata WhatsGoodApps LLC · verified 2026-05-26]
• [Source: FTC 16 CFR Part 255, Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising · verified 2026-05-26]
• [Source: r/AIGirlfriend community sentiment aggregation, memory recall examples · verified 2026-05-26]
• [Source: CCBill Help Center refund and dispute process · verified 2026-05-26]

Related reading

• Uncensored AI chat explained, the category-level guide
• Best uncensored AI chatbot , the ranked editorial picks
• Pleasur.ai review, chat specialist with 11-document legal index
• JustSext review, 1.2s response time, licensed real creators
• Candy.ai's per-dimension review, image-first alternative, persistent -75% yearly
• see our OurDream review, 2+ week memory horizon, 4-character group chat
• How we test AI companions, full 8-category scoring + Score-Lock policy

Frequently asked questions

---

Last verified May 26, · See errata log for any post-publish corrections · Editor: Alexandra Joly · Scoring page v1.0 · Editorial process · Affiliate disclosure